Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 3,321 - 3,340 results of 4,620 for search 'significantly ((((linear decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.42s Refine Results
  1. 3321

    Table 1_Relationship between plasma atherogenic index and subclinical hypothyroidism: an analysis of NHANES data and animal experiment.docx by Qiwei Chen (1417807)

    Published 2025
    “…Weighted regression and linear models assessed associations between AIP (and its quartiles) and SCH and thyroid hormones. …”
  2. 3322

    Image 1_Boys born with hypospadias and fetal growth restriction exhibit shorter anogenital distances: a retrospective cross-sectional study.tif by Wenfeng Pan (8726820)

    Published 2025
    “…Linear regression analysis revealed that proximal hypospadias and SGA were significantly associated with shorter AGDs across all measurements (e.g., proximal hypospadias reduced ASD by 6.52 mm, 95% CI: −9.97 to −3.06, P < 0.001; SGA reduced ASD by 4.48 mm, 95% CI: −8.00 to −0.97, P = 0.01). …”
  3. 3323

    Table 2_Relationship between plasma atherogenic index and subclinical hypothyroidism: an analysis of NHANES data and animal experiment.docx by Qiwei Chen (1417807)

    Published 2025
    “…Weighted regression and linear models assessed associations between AIP (and its quartiles) and SCH and thyroid hormones. …”
  4. 3324

    Data Sheet 1_Qifuyin alleviates anxiety and depression in 3×Tg-AD mice by modulating neuroendocrine function.zip by Tianhao Yu (8120651)

    Published 2025
    “…In the QFY-treated group, plasma CORT levels were significantly decreased, whereas FSH and LH levels were significantly increased. …”
  5. 3325

    Data Sheet 1_Metabolic adaptation fluctuates with different prediction equations: a secondary analysis based on a weight-loss clinical trial.docx by Molian Tang (18876955)

    Published 2025
    “…Both Katch-McArdle-determined RMR and BIA-determined RMR presented a significant decrease between baseline and the end of the intervention (week 16). …”
  6. 3326

    Data Sheet 1_TREM-1 as a potential gatekeeper of neuroinflammatory responses: therapeutic validation and mechanistic insights in experimental traumatic brain injury.zip by Yunsheng Zhang (474242)

    Published 2025
    “…Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± SD, and group comparisons were made by two-tailed Student’s t-tests or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.…”
  7. 3327

    Tropical volcanic eruptions enhance global tropical cyclone geneses by Jiuwei Zhao (8548263)

    Published 2025
    “…Here, we utilize global </b><b>reanalysis data and high-resolution large ensemble simulations to uncover a robust link </b><b>between TVEs and enhanced global TCGF. We find a significant increase in TCGF over the </b><b>Pacific within two years following strong TVEs, accompanied by an insignificant decrease </b><b>over the South Indian Ocean, leading to a net global TCGF increase. …”
  8. 3328

    Table 1_Association of spicy food consumption with colorectal polyp and adenoma prevalence: findings from the Lanxi Pre-Colorectal Cancer Cohort (LP3C).docx by Peiling Hu (12259394)

    Published 2025
    “…Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a non-linear relationship between spicy food intake and polyp risk (P for non-linearity < 0.001), characterized by initial risk elevation followed by a slight decrease with increasing consumption levels. …”
  9. 3329

    Table 1_Refrigerator ownership and the nutrition-health trade-off: evidence from Chinese households.docx by Manli Zheng (21288128)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>Refrigerator ownership significantly increases daily calorie intake by 39.1%. …”
  10. 3330

    Impact of Oral Semaglutide on Kidney Outcomes in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the SOUL Randomized Trial by Johannes F. E. Mann (22017555)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p dir="ltr">RESULTS</p><p dir="ltr">Among 9,650 participants, mean eGFR was 73.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 and follow-up was 47.5 months. …”
  11. 3331

    feature parameters by CHIN-CHENG CHU (20718575)

    Published 2025
    “…<p dir="ltr">We evaluated seven eye‐movement features before and after fatigue using paired t‐tests on mean ± SD values. Sample Entropy on the X-axis decreased from 0.095 ± 0.054 to 0.080 ± 0.048 (p = 0.025) and on the Y-axis from 0.106 ± 0.046 to 0.090 ± 0.043 (p = 0.025), whereas Approximate Entropy and Cross Entropy showed no significant change. …”
  12. 3332

    Data_.xlsx by Raja Bouguezzi (17915965)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, the asymmetry score exhibited a moderate decrease (∆46.96%, ES=0.64). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the CG across all fitness measures. …”
  13. 3333

    Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  14. 3334

    Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  15. 3335

    Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  16. 3336

    Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  17. 3337

    Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  18. 3338

    Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  19. 3339

    Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  20. 3340

    Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”