Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
3321
Table 1_Relationship between plasma atherogenic index and subclinical hypothyroidism: an analysis of NHANES data and animal experiment.docx
Published 2025“…Weighted regression and linear models assessed associations between AIP (and its quartiles) and SCH and thyroid hormones. …”
-
3322
Image 1_Boys born with hypospadias and fetal growth restriction exhibit shorter anogenital distances: a retrospective cross-sectional study.tif
Published 2025“…Linear regression analysis revealed that proximal hypospadias and SGA were significantly associated with shorter AGDs across all measurements (e.g., proximal hypospadias reduced ASD by 6.52 mm, 95% CI: −9.97 to −3.06, P < 0.001; SGA reduced ASD by 4.48 mm, 95% CI: −8.00 to −0.97, P = 0.01). …”
-
3323
Table 2_Relationship between plasma atherogenic index and subclinical hypothyroidism: an analysis of NHANES data and animal experiment.docx
Published 2025“…Weighted regression and linear models assessed associations between AIP (and its quartiles) and SCH and thyroid hormones. …”
-
3324
Data Sheet 1_Qifuyin alleviates anxiety and depression in 3×Tg-AD mice by modulating neuroendocrine function.zip
Published 2025“…In the QFY-treated group, plasma CORT levels were significantly decreased, whereas FSH and LH levels were significantly increased. …”
-
3325
Data Sheet 1_Metabolic adaptation fluctuates with different prediction equations: a secondary analysis based on a weight-loss clinical trial.docx
Published 2025“…Both Katch-McArdle-determined RMR and BIA-determined RMR presented a significant decrease between baseline and the end of the intervention (week 16). …”
-
3326
Data Sheet 1_TREM-1 as a potential gatekeeper of neuroinflammatory responses: therapeutic validation and mechanistic insights in experimental traumatic brain injury.zip
Published 2025“…Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± SD, and group comparisons were made by two-tailed Student’s t-tests or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.…”
-
3327
Tropical volcanic eruptions enhance global tropical cyclone geneses
Published 2025“…Here, we utilize global </b><b>reanalysis data and high-resolution large ensemble simulations to uncover a robust link </b><b>between TVEs and enhanced global TCGF. We find a significant increase in TCGF over the </b><b>Pacific within two years following strong TVEs, accompanied by an insignificant decrease </b><b>over the South Indian Ocean, leading to a net global TCGF increase. …”
-
3328
Table 1_Association of spicy food consumption with colorectal polyp and adenoma prevalence: findings from the Lanxi Pre-Colorectal Cancer Cohort (LP3C).docx
Published 2025“…Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a non-linear relationship between spicy food intake and polyp risk (P for non-linearity < 0.001), characterized by initial risk elevation followed by a slight decrease with increasing consumption levels. …”
-
3329
Table 1_Refrigerator ownership and the nutrition-health trade-off: evidence from Chinese households.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Refrigerator ownership significantly increases daily calorie intake by 39.1%. …”
-
3330
Impact of Oral Semaglutide on Kidney Outcomes in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the SOUL Randomized Trial
Published 2025“…</p><p dir="ltr">RESULTS</p><p dir="ltr">Among 9,650 participants, mean eGFR was 73.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 and follow-up was 47.5 months. …”
-
3331
feature parameters
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr">We evaluated seven eye‐movement features before and after fatigue using paired t‐tests on mean ± SD values. Sample Entropy on the X-axis decreased from 0.095 ± 0.054 to 0.080 ± 0.048 (p = 0.025) and on the Y-axis from 0.106 ± 0.046 to 0.090 ± 0.043 (p = 0.025), whereas Approximate Entropy and Cross Entropy showed no significant change. …”
-
3332
Data_.xlsx
Published 2024“…Additionally, the asymmetry score exhibited a moderate decrease (∆46.96%, ES=0.64). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the CG across all fitness measures. …”
-
3333
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3334
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3335
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3336
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3337
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3338
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3339
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3340
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”