Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1,201 - 1,220 results of 1,805 for search 'significantly ((((linear decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (teer decrease))', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 1201

    Table 1_Association of spicy food consumption with colorectal polyp and adenoma prevalence: findings from the Lanxi Pre-Colorectal Cancer Cohort (LP3C).docx by Peiling Hu (12259394)

    Published 2025
    “…Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a non-linear relationship between spicy food intake and polyp risk (P for non-linearity < 0.001), characterized by initial risk elevation followed by a slight decrease with increasing consumption levels. …”
  2. 1202

    S5 Fig - The human medial temporal lobe represents memory items in their ordinal position in both declarative and motor memory domains by Ainsley Temudo (21673160)

    Published 2025
    “…Planned pairwise comparisons indicate that in M1 and PMC, similarity values of the diagonal (i.e., lag 0, same position) were significantly larger than all other lags (i.e., lag 0 > all other lags, all <i>p</i><sub><i>corr</i></sub> < .05), while in the PHC, the diagonal was only significantly larger than lag 2 (<i>p</i><sub><i>corr</i></sub> < .05). …”
  3. 1203

    Table 1_Refrigerator ownership and the nutrition-health trade-off: evidence from Chinese households.docx by Manli Zheng (21288128)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>Refrigerator ownership significantly increases daily calorie intake by 39.1%. …”
  4. 1204

    Data_.xlsx by Raja Bouguezzi (17915965)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, the asymmetry score exhibited a moderate decrease (∆46.96%, ES=0.64). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the CG across all fitness measures. …”
  5. 1205

    Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  6. 1206

    Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  7. 1207

    Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  8. 1208

    Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  9. 1209

    Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  10. 1210

    Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  11. 1211

    Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  12. 1212

    Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  13. 1213

    Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  14. 1214

    Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  15. 1215

    Data Sheet 1_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  16. 1216

    Table 3_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  17. 1217

    Table 4_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  18. 1218

    Data Sheet 1_Association between the systemic immune-inflammatory index and the immune response after hepatitis B vaccination: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data.docx by Jiayan Hu (18593615)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, antibody expression significantly decreased as the SII increased beyond the threshold of 448.3.…”
  19. 1219

    Data Sheet 2_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  20. 1220

    Table 2_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”