Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 2,001 - 2,020 results of 4,620 for search 'significantly ((((linear decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (larger decrease))', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 2001

    S1 Dataset - by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  2. 2002

    Mineral content of raw materials. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  3. 2003

    Technical parameters of ultrafine cement. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  4. 2004

    Technical parameters of PVA fiber. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  5. 2005

    Sample preparation and testing flow chart. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  6. 2006

    XRD patterns of MUCG at different curing age. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  7. 2007

    FTIR spectra of MUCG at different curing age. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  8. 2008

    Description of fitting models. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  9. 2009

    Mineral composition of UFC, B, and SF. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    “…BET and SEM analyses demonstrated that the specific surface area and porosity (most probable pore size) gradually decreased over time. At various ages, mesopores (cumulative pore diameter, median pore diameter) initially increased and then decreased. …”
  10. 2010
  11. 2011
  12. 2012

    Map showing the intervention and control LGAs. by Chinwe C. Eze (8787503)

    Published 2025
    “…However, post-intervention, the adjusted mean SARI Stigma Score significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of 37.72 (95% CI: 36.01–39.43, p < 0.000).…”
  13. 2013

    Consort diagram. by Chinwe C. Eze (8787503)

    Published 2025
    “…However, post-intervention, the adjusted mean SARI Stigma Score significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of 37.72 (95% CI: 36.01–39.43, p < 0.000).…”
  14. 2014
  15. 2015
  16. 2016
  17. 2017
  18. 2018
  19. 2019
  20. 2020