Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
2881
Discovery of Novel [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5‑<i>a</i>]pyrimidine Derivatives as Novel Potent S‑Phase Kinase-Associated Protein 2 (SKP2) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer
Published 2024“…Pharmacological inhibition of Skp2 has exhibited promising antitumor activity. Herein, we present the design and optimization of a series of [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-<i>a</i>]pyrimidine-based small molecules targeting Skp2. …”
-
2882
Discovery of Novel [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5‑<i>a</i>]pyrimidine Derivatives as Novel Potent S‑Phase Kinase-Associated Protein 2 (SKP2) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer
Published 2024“…Pharmacological inhibition of Skp2 has exhibited promising antitumor activity. Herein, we present the design and optimization of a series of [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-<i>a</i>]pyrimidine-based small molecules targeting Skp2. …”
-
2883
Discovery of Novel [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5‑<i>a</i>]pyrimidine Derivatives as Novel Potent S‑Phase Kinase-Associated Protein 2 (SKP2) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer
Published 2024“…Pharmacological inhibition of Skp2 has exhibited promising antitumor activity. Herein, we present the design and optimization of a series of [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-<i>a</i>]pyrimidine-based small molecules targeting Skp2. …”
-
2884
Discovery of Novel [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5‑<i>a</i>]pyrimidine Derivatives as Novel Potent S‑Phase Kinase-Associated Protein 2 (SKP2) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cancer
Published 2024“…Pharmacological inhibition of Skp2 has exhibited promising antitumor activity. Herein, we present the design and optimization of a series of [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-<i>a</i>]pyrimidine-based small molecules targeting Skp2. …”
-
2885
-
2886
Prediction of transition readiness.
Published 2025“…In most transition domains, help needed did not decrease with age and was not affected by function. …”
-
2887
-
2888
Dataset visualization diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2889
Dataset sample images.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2890
Performance comparison of different models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2891
C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2892
YOLOv8n detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2893
YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2894
BiFormer structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2895
YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2896
GSConv module structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2897
Performance comparison of three loss functions.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2898
mAP0.5 Curves of various models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2899
Network loss function change diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
2900
Comparative diagrams of different indicators.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”