Search alternatives:
longer decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
Showing 1,501 - 1,520 results of 2,198 for search 'significantly ((((longer decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (linear decrease))', query time: 0.42s Refine Results
  1. 1501

    Table 1_Adherence to recombinant human growth hormone therapy in children: influencing factors and clinical implications.xlsx by Wenjing Chang (8334480)

    Published 2025
    “…Patients with severe growth deficits (≤P3 percentile) showed higher adherence than those with moderate deficits. Longer treatment duration was linked to decreased adherence. …”
  2. 1502

    Table 1_Nonlinear pathological trajectory of a high-myopia C57/BL6J mouse model induced by form deprivation.xlsx by Yue Wen (1673968)

    Published 2024
    “…Retinal vascular area proportion in covered eyes decreased significantly (P < 0.05), with a decline rate of 11% from weeks 4 to 8 and a faster decline of 19% from weeks 8 to 12, while this proportion increased significantly in control eyes.…”
  3. 1503

    Table 2_An 8-week 24-form Tai Chi intervention on cognition in Chinese college students overusing short videos: a randomized controlled trial.xlsx by Yu-fan Li (22162804)

    Published 2025
    “…Pre-intervention, TCG and OCG reaction times were significantly longer than LCG (p < 0.05). Post-intervention, reaction times decreased for TCG and OCG, with TCG’s decline being more significant, aligning with LCG (p < 0.05). …”
  4. 1504

    Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  5. 1505

    Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  6. 1506

    Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  7. 1507

    Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  8. 1508

    Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  9. 1509

    Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  10. 1510

    Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  11. 1511

    Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  12. 1512

    Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  13. 1513

    Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  14. 1514

    Data Sheet 1_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  15. 1515

    Table 3_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  16. 1516

    Table 4_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  17. 1517

    Data Sheet 1_Association between the systemic immune-inflammatory index and the immune response after hepatitis B vaccination: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data.docx by Jiayan Hu (18593615)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, antibody expression significantly decreased as the SII increased beyond the threshold of 448.3.…”
  18. 1518

    Data Sheet 2_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  19. 1519

    Table 2_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  20. 1520

    Data Sheet 3_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”