Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
1381
Surface Modification of Islets with L-DOPA-KF7 Enhances Islet Survival by Inhibiting IBMIR in Intrahepatic Islet Transplantation
Published 2025“…Islets coated with L-DOPA-KF7 restored normoglycemia in diabetic mice, and survival time was significantly longer compared to control group. Transplantation of L-DOPA-KF7 coated islets was associated with reduced blood clot formation and decreased infiltration of CD11b+ cells and platelets. …”
-
1382
Supplementary Material for: Impact of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele on cognition and omega-3 fatty acid levels in the plasma membrane of red blood cells in healthy elderly Japanes...
Published 2025“…The ratio of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) to arachidonic acid was significantly decreased, and the erythrocyte eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and DHA levels tended to be reduced in APOE4 carriers. …”
-
1383
Table 2_Adherence to recombinant human growth hormone therapy in children: influencing factors and clinical implications.xlsx
Published 2025“…Patients with severe growth deficits (≤P3 percentile) showed higher adherence than those with moderate deficits. Longer treatment duration was linked to decreased adherence. …”
-
1384
Table 1_Adherence to recombinant human growth hormone therapy in children: influencing factors and clinical implications.xlsx
Published 2025“…Patients with severe growth deficits (≤P3 percentile) showed higher adherence than those with moderate deficits. Longer treatment duration was linked to decreased adherence. …”
-
1385
Table 1_Nonlinear pathological trajectory of a high-myopia C57/BL6J mouse model induced by form deprivation.xlsx
Published 2024“…Retinal vascular area proportion in covered eyes decreased significantly (P < 0.05), with a decline rate of 11% from weeks 4 to 8 and a faster decline of 19% from weeks 8 to 12, while this proportion increased significantly in control eyes.…”
-
1386
Table_1_Differential microbiome features in lake–river systems of Taihu basin in response to water flow disturbance.xlsx
Published 2024“…Additionally, migration and dispersal rates of microbes in the ET region, along with the impact of dispersal limitations, were significantly higher than in the ST region. High flow disturbances notably reduced microbial niche width and overlap, decreasing the complexity and stability of microbial coexistence networks. …”
-
1387
Image_1_Differential microbiome features in lake–river systems of Taihu basin in response to water flow disturbance.pdf
Published 2024“…Additionally, migration and dispersal rates of microbes in the ET region, along with the impact of dispersal limitations, were significantly higher than in the ST region. High flow disturbances notably reduced microbial niche width and overlap, decreasing the complexity and stability of microbial coexistence networks. …”
-
1388
Table 1_Comparative analysis of trends in the burden of motor neuron disease in China, the United States, and globally from 1990 to 2021: projections for 2022–2041.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>From 1990 to 2021, the incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs of MND in China, the United States, and globally showed significant increases, with the largest increase observed in mortality (China +126%, USA +118%, global +156%). …”
-
1389
Supplementary file 1_Comparative analysis of trends in the burden of motor neuron disease in China, the United States, and globally from 1990 to 2021: projections for 2022–2041.doc...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>From 1990 to 2021, the incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs of MND in China, the United States, and globally showed significant increases, with the largest increase observed in mortality (China +126%, USA +118%, global +156%). …”
-
1390
Presentation 1_Comparative analysis of trends in the burden of motor neuron disease in China, the United States, and globally from 1990 to 2021: projections for 2022–2041.pptx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>From 1990 to 2021, the incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs of MND in China, the United States, and globally showed significant increases, with the largest increase observed in mortality (China +126%, USA +118%, global +156%). …”
-
1391
Table 2_An 8-week 24-form Tai Chi intervention on cognition in Chinese college students overusing short videos: a randomized controlled trial.xlsx
Published 2025“…Pre-intervention, TCG and OCG reaction times were significantly longer than LCG (p < 0.05). Post-intervention, reaction times decreased for TCG and OCG, with TCG’s decline being more significant, aligning with LCG (p < 0.05). …”
-
1392
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1393
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1394
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1395
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1396
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1397
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1398
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1399
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
1400
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”