Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1621
-
1622
-
1623
-
1624
-
1625
-
1626
-
1627
Group control-after intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1628
Group SFA-before intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1629
Lost cases.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1630
Group control-before intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1631
Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%).
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1632
Pre-Experiment.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1633
Group SFA-after intervention.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t = 11.906, P < 0.001) and depression scores (t = 14.991, P < 0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t = 7.055, P < 0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t = -2.828, P < 0.001). …”
-
1634
-
1635
-
1636
-
1637
-
1638
-
1639
-
1640
Significance analysis data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) The manifestation of mining pressure in gangue backfill mining is influenced by factors such as mining height and backfill collapse ratio; (2) Under the support of coal gangue, the concentrated stress in the coal seam significantly decreases, forming an arched shape according to the mining stages; (3) The range of plastic failure in the coal seam remains relatively stable under gangue backfill mining, with the plastic zone of the roof plate exhibiting a strip-like distribution; (4) Both range analysis and variance analysis revealed that the sensitivity ranking is backfill collapse ratio > mining height > elastic modulus. …”