Showing 1,621 - 1,640 results of 18,812 for search 'significantly ((((lower decrease) OR (((greater decrease) OR (a decrease))))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.48s Refine Results
  1. 1621
  2. 1622

    Table 1 - by Marco Carbonara (11483575)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  3. 1623
  4. 1624
  5. 1625
  6. 1626
  7. 1627

    Group control-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  8. 1628

    Group SFA-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  9. 1629

    Lost cases. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  10. 1630

    Group control-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  11. 1631

    Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%). by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  12. 1632

    Pre-Experiment. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  13. 1633

    Group SFA-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  14. 1634
  15. 1635
  16. 1636
  17. 1637
  18. 1638
  19. 1639
  20. 1640

    Significance analysis data. by Lei Zhu (16642)

    Published 2025
    “…The results indicate that: (1) The manifestation of mining pressure in gangue backfill mining is influenced by factors such as mining height and backfill collapse ratio; (2) Under the support of coal gangue, the concentrated stress in the coal seam significantly decreases, forming an arched shape according to the mining stages; (3) The range of plastic failure in the coal seam remains relatively stable under gangue backfill mining, with the plastic zone of the roof plate exhibiting a strip-like distribution; (4) Both range analysis and variance analysis revealed that the sensitivity ranking is backfill collapse ratio > mining height > elastic modulus. …”