Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
881
-
882
-
883
-
884
-
885
-
886
-
887
Table 1_Pandemic predisposing influence for feline lower urinary disorders.xlsx
Published 2025“…The DP group demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in relapses (p < 0.001) and mortality (p < 0.05) compared to the BP group. …”
-
888
Table 2_Pandemic predisposing influence for feline lower urinary disorders.xlsx
Published 2025“…The DP group demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in relapses (p < 0.001) and mortality (p < 0.05) compared to the BP group. …”
-
889
-
890
-
891
-
892
-
893
-
894
-
895
-
896
General characteristics of study subjects.
Published 2025“…COVID-19 did not affect inpatient mortality (p = 0.9608), but in-hospital mortality decreased from 12% to 7% in the medical aid group.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Overall, we found that COVID-19 had an impact on admission rates of patients with AMI but did not have a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. …”
-
897
-
898
Table 1_Global burden of reported lower respiratory system fungal infection.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>On a global scale, the burden of lower respiratory fungal infections decreased significantly from 1990 to 2021, with a decline in mortality rates. …”
-
899
Renal outcomes of both treatment groups.
Published 2025“…Participants in the multifactorial group achieved a significant mean difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (mean difference = −0.14, 95% CI: −0.27–0.001, P < 0.03), and significant adjusted mean difference of eGFR levels difference (3.93 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI: 1.27–6.58, P < 0.01) at study completion compared to those in the control group. …”
-
900