Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
941
-
942
-
943
-
944
-
945
-
946
Mechlorethamine gel causes epithelium thinning, epithelium-stroma separation, and decreased total stroma cell count.
Published 2025“…<p>A) Epithelium thickness decreased, and B) the percentage of epithelium-stroma separation increased after NM exposure. …”
-
947
Podocyte numbers in control and iPLA<sub>2</sub>γ KO mice (WT1-positive cells).
Published 2024Subjects: -
948
-
949
-
950
-
951
-
952
-
953
Study sites and number of participants enrolled in the KAP and OOP surveys.
Published 2024Subjects: -
954
Average cost per visit for HIV and HTN care (absolute vs. relative contributions).
Published 2024Subjects: -
955
-
956
-
957
Individual stability values for different gait events under various conditions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
958
-
959
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
960
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”