Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
4081
-
4082
-
4083
-
4084
The percentage of studies that resulted in insect death increased over time.
Published 2025“…There was a significant decrease in the proportion of studies reporting just invasive handling (without death) over time (linear regression; t<sub>20,18</sub> = 4.00, p = 0.001, R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.44). …”
-
4085
Activation of the RSC-ACC projections causes mechanical and thermal pain sensitization.
Published 2025“…CNO in hM3Dq group, **<i>p</i> = 0.0021 < 0.01, <i>n =</i> 9 mice). ns means no significant difference. Error bars indicate SEM. …”
-
4086
-
4087
Basic information of the participants.
Published 2024“…The scores of deformity of Stahl’s ear were lower than those of others after follow-up (P < 0.05). …”
-
4088
-
4089
-
4090
-
4091
-
4092
Complementary conditioning measures in healthy subjects.
Published 2024“…<b>(I) Novelty</b> ratings significantly decreased from pre to post-conditioning (F<sub>(1,51)</sub> = 10.2, <i>P</i> = 0.002; post hoc CS<sup>-</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.0001; post hoc CS<sup>+</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.01) but similarly for both stimuli (F<sub>(1, 51)</sub> = 0.17, <i>P</i> = 0.7; Interaction: F<sub>(1, 51)</sub> = 1.1, <i>P</i> = 0.3). …”
-
4093
Comparison of dot gain across paper types and screen frequency.
Published 2025“…Dot gain curves for 133 lpi and 175 lpi show a consistent non-linear trend, rising to a maximum in the mid-tone range (40%–60% dot area) before decreasing. …”
-
4094
Complementary conditioning measures across the clinical study groups.
Published 2024“…Post hoc tests showed significant decreases for the surgical group (<i>P</i> = 0.05), while in the remaining groups, results did not reach significance (Healthy, <i>P</i> = 0.4; Obese, <i>P</i> = 0.1). …”
-
4095
General data comparison.
Published 2024“…The mortality rate during the pandemic (0.13%) was lower than after the pandemic (2.45%).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted trauma patients admitted through the emergency department, with increases in the proportion of male and younger patients, surgical cases, and a decrease in mortality rates during the pandemic.…”
-
4096
The epidemic period group.
Published 2024“…The mortality rate during the pandemic (0.13%) was lower than after the pandemic (2.45%).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted trauma patients admitted through the emergency department, with increases in the proportion of male and younger patients, surgical cases, and a decrease in mortality rates during the pandemic.…”
-
4097
Original data.
Published 2024“…The mortality rate during the pandemic (0.13%) was lower than after the pandemic (2.45%).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted trauma patients admitted through the emergency department, with increases in the proportion of male and younger patients, surgical cases, and a decrease in mortality rates during the pandemic.…”
-
4098
Post-epidemic group.
Published 2024“…The mortality rate during the pandemic (0.13%) was lower than after the pandemic (2.45%).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted trauma patients admitted through the emergency department, with increases in the proportion of male and younger patients, surgical cases, and a decrease in mortality rates during the pandemic.…”
-
4099
Comparison of admissions by department.
Published 2024“…The mortality rate during the pandemic (0.13%) was lower than after the pandemic (2.45%).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted trauma patients admitted through the emergency department, with increases in the proportion of male and younger patients, surgical cases, and a decrease in mortality rates during the pandemic.…”
-
4100