Showing 8,121 - 8,140 results of 18,812 for search 'significantly ((((lower decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (((greater decrease) OR (mean decrease))))', query time: 0.43s Refine Results
  1. 8121
  2. 8122
  3. 8123

    Basic features of microtopography. by Qingping Gou (22641045)

    Published 2025
    “…The results showed that: the difference of shallow soil moisture in different microtopographies on a slope surface was not significant, the difference of deep soil moisture was significant, and the soil moisture overuse was the largest in the gully (GU), amounting to 386.36 mm, and the smallest in the ephemeral gully (EG) (131.02 mm); the GU, the sink hole (SH), and the scarp (SC) showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing with the increase of soil depth, and the platform (PL) has little overall trend of change in soil moisture with the increase of soil depth, and the soil moisture of US and EG shows the trend of “decreasing-then increasing-then decreasing” with the increase of soil depth. …”
  4. 8124

    Soil bulk density of different microtopographies. by Qingping Gou (22641045)

    Published 2025
    “…The results showed that: the difference of shallow soil moisture in different microtopographies on a slope surface was not significant, the difference of deep soil moisture was significant, and the soil moisture overuse was the largest in the gully (GU), amounting to 386.36 mm, and the smallest in the ephemeral gully (EG) (131.02 mm); the GU, the sink hole (SH), and the scarp (SC) showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing with the increase of soil depth, and the platform (PL) has little overall trend of change in soil moisture with the increase of soil depth, and the soil moisture of US and EG shows the trend of “decreasing-then increasing-then decreasing” with the increase of soil depth. …”
  5. 8125
  6. 8126

    Distribution of study areas. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  7. 8127

    Descriptive statistics of variables. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  8. 8128

    Code. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  9. 8129

    Schematic of the conclusions. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  10. 8130

    Robustness test. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  11. 8131

    Data. by Jie Zhang (64655)

    Published 2024
    “…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
  12. 8132
  13. 8133

    Flowchart of the study population. by Emma Hertting (21568077)

    Published 2025
    “…Identified early-onset FGR had a decreased risk of stillbirth (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23–0.96), an increased risk of severe newborn distress (aOR 2.80, 95% CI 1.79–4.39) and severe childhood outcome (aOR 3.00, 95% CI 1.51–5.94), compared to non-identified SGA/FGR. …”
  14. 8134
  15. 8135
  16. 8136
  17. 8137
  18. 8138
  19. 8139
  20. 8140