Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
4741
-
4742
-
4743
-
4744
Search strategy.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4745
Fig 1 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4746
GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4747
Fig 4 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4748
Difference in GMT for HPV16 and HPV18 in PWH.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4749
Fig 3 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4750
Summary of characteristics of studies reviewed.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4751
Cumulative meta-analysis.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4752
Summary of immunogenicity information.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
4753
-
4754
-
4755
-
4756
-
4757
Passive sensing data.
Published 2025“…Results also showed that metrics that do not account for imbalance (mean absolute error, accuracy) systematically overestimated performance, XGBoost models performed on par with or better than LSTM models, and a significant yet very small decrease in performance was observed as the forecast horizon expanded. …”
-
4758
Surveys.
Published 2025“…Results also showed that metrics that do not account for imbalance (mean absolute error, accuracy) systematically overestimated performance, XGBoost models performed on par with or better than LSTM models, and a significant yet very small decrease in performance was observed as the forecast horizon expanded. …”
-
4759
-
4760