Showing 4,741 - 4,760 results of 18,379 for search 'significantly ((((lower decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (((teer decrease) OR (greatest decrease))))', query time: 0.50s Refine Results
  1. 4741
  2. 4742
  3. 4743
  4. 4744

    Search strategy. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  5. 4745

    Fig 1 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  6. 4746

    GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  7. 4747

    Fig 4 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  8. 4748

    Difference in GMT for HPV16 and HPV18 in PWH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  9. 4749

    Fig 3 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  10. 4750

    Summary of characteristics of studies reviewed. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  11. 4751

    Cumulative meta-analysis. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  12. 4752

    Summary of immunogenicity information. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  13. 4753
  14. 4754
  15. 4755
  16. 4756
  17. 4757

    Passive sensing data. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

    Published 2025
    “…Results also showed that metrics that do not account for imbalance (mean absolute error, accuracy) systematically overestimated performance, XGBoost models performed on par with or better than LSTM models, and a significant yet very small decrease in performance was observed as the forecast horizon expanded. …”
  18. 4758

    Surveys. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

    Published 2025
    “…Results also showed that metrics that do not account for imbalance (mean absolute error, accuracy) systematically overestimated performance, XGBoost models performed on par with or better than LSTM models, and a significant yet very small decrease in performance was observed as the forecast horizon expanded. …”
  19. 4759
  20. 4760