Test plan table. by Xia Li (14984)

“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”

Gas jet subsoiling model. by Xia Li (14984)

“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”

Schematic diagram of the airflow passage. by Xia Li (14984)

“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”

Variation in soil penetration resistance. by Xia Li (14984)

“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”

Supersonic gas jet subsoiler experiment. by Xia Li (14984)

“…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”

Effects of compound 4f on cognitive function in mice with KA-induced neurodegeneration. by Naoto Arimura (416442)

Effects of compound 4f on the seizure-like response elicited by kainic acid (KA). by Naoto Arimura (416442)

CRISPRi interrogation of the <i>Sox10</i> ECs. by Hongjoo An (21703199)

Effect of Sox10-E1 and Sox10-E2 on the expression of <i>Pick1.</i> by Hongjoo An (21703199)

Gene expression levels of <i>CB1R</i>, <i>CB2R</i>, and <i>MAGL</i> in KA-injected mice treated with compound 4f. by Naoto Arimura (416442)

Temporal dynamics of Sox10-E1 and Sox10-E2 along the OL lineage. by Hongjoo An (21703199)

Original data2. by Lan Zeng (638254)

“…Our analysis revealed that <i>RP11-502I4.3</i> expression was lower in the retinas of diabetic rats and HG-stimulated HRMECs compared with normal glucose conditions. …”

Original data1. by Lan Zeng (638254)

“…Our analysis revealed that <i>RP11-502I4.3</i> expression was lower in the retinas of diabetic rats and HG-stimulated HRMECs compared with normal glucose conditions. …”

Comparison within groups. by Neng Pan (5262032)

DataSheet1_Prognostic significance of fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography delta radiomics following bridging therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma undergoing CAR... by Colton Ladbury (19768281)

Descriptive statistics and variable definitions. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

The results of endogenous analysis. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

Correlation test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

S1 Dataset - by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”

The mediation of confidence. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”