Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
3501
-
3502
-
3503
Raw data.
Published 2025“…The incidence of fractures was significantly greater among participants with low RC levels than among those with high RC levels (6.4% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.01). …”
-
3504
Baseline characteristics of the subjects.
Published 2025“…The incidence of fractures was significantly greater among participants with low RC levels than among those with high RC levels (6.4% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.01). …”
-
3505
-
3506
Classification of panels after the impact test.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3507
XXXX.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3508
Compounds of Type III Portland cement.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3509
XXXX.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3510
Impact test procedure on panel.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3511
Summarized data of cost calculation.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3512
Mixing and flow condition of REC15HDM.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3513
External and internal view of the Omni mixer [
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3514
Required properties of sand.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3515
Classification of panels after the impact test.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3516
Static loading procedure.
Published 2025“…This enabled a reduction in fiber content to 1.2% (a 60% decrease) and panel thickness to 22 mm (a 4.35% decrease) compared to panels with thicker fibers. …”
-
3517
Description of study characteristics.
Published 2025“…Loss of PrEP retention rates were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in studies from Europe, Australia and multiple regions (vs. …”
-
3518
-
3519
-
3520