Showing 1,941 - 1,960 results of 5,028 for search 'significantly ((((lower decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (linear decrease))', query time: 0.40s Refine Results
  1. 1941
  2. 1942
  3. 1943
  4. 1944

    Descriptive statistics and variable definitions. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  5. 1945

    The results of endogenous analysis. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  6. 1946

    Correlation test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  7. 1947

    S1 Dataset - by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  8. 1948

    The mediation of confidence. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  9. 1949

    Robustness test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  10. 1950

    The effects of consumption inequality on SWB. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  11. 1951
  12. 1952

    Baseline characteristics. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  13. 1953

    Data ste. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  14. 1954

    Comparison of post-experimental outcome measures. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  15. 1955
  16. 1956
  17. 1957
  18. 1958
  19. 1959

    S1 File - by Kathleen Kristensen (17525457)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Participants had significantly lower odds (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.65) of reporting difficulty in accessing syringes later in the pandemic. …”
  20. 1960

    Chicago COVID-19 mitigation policy timeline. by Kathleen Kristensen (17525457)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Participants had significantly lower odds (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.65) of reporting difficulty in accessing syringes later in the pandemic. …”