Showing 1,961 - 1,980 results of 5,028 for search 'significantly ((((lower decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (linear decrease))', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 1961

    Demographic and ocular features. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the PCG group, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA levels were notably higher than in controls (p < 0.001, <i><i>p</i> </i>= 0.020), while TAS levels were significantly lower (p = 0.043). Adjusting for age and gender, the serum TAS (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.85, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.037), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.35, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) and MDA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.034) were determined to be independent risk/protective factors for PCG. …”
  2. 1962

    Machine learning model to diagnose PCG. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the PCG group, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA levels were notably higher than in controls (p < 0.001, <i><i>p</i> </i>= 0.020), while TAS levels were significantly lower (p = 0.043). Adjusting for age and gender, the serum TAS (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.85, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.037), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.35, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) and MDA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.034) were determined to be independent risk/protective factors for PCG. …”
  3. 1963

    ROC curves of TAS + SOD + MDA to diagnose PCG. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the PCG group, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA levels were notably higher than in controls (p < 0.001, <i><i>p</i> </i>= 0.020), while TAS levels were significantly lower (p = 0.043). Adjusting for age and gender, the serum TAS (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.85, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.037), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.35, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) and MDA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.034) were determined to be independent risk/protective factors for PCG. …”
  4. 1964
  5. 1965

    Variable settings and assignment descriptions. by Yuling Jin (11872953)

    Published 2025
    “…The results showed that (1) rural population aging had emerged as a significant challenge for Ulanqab, with the proportion of people aged 60 and above increasing from 12.3% in 2000 to 44.9% in 2020. …”
  6. 1966
  7. 1967
  8. 1968
  9. 1969
  10. 1970

    Renamed 05c60. by Hongjun Sun (12554742)

    Published 2025
    “…The study reveals three key findings. (1) Contribution levels of China’s eight comprehensive economic zones to national standard development have significantly increased. The Northern Coastal comprehensive economic zone has the highest contribution levels, followed by the Eastern and Southern Coastal zones, whereas the Northwestern and Northeastern zones have lower contribution levels. (2) The overall regional disparity in national standard development contribution levels is decreasing, with the largest intraregional disparities found in the Northern and Southern Coastal zones. …”
  11. 1971

    Region Division. by Hongjun Sun (12554742)

    Published 2025
    “…The study reveals three key findings. (1) Contribution levels of China’s eight comprehensive economic zones to national standard development have significantly increased. The Northern Coastal comprehensive economic zone has the highest contribution levels, followed by the Eastern and Southern Coastal zones, whereas the Northwestern and Northeastern zones have lower contribution levels. (2) The overall regional disparity in national standard development contribution levels is decreasing, with the largest intraregional disparities found in the Northern and Southern Coastal zones. …”
  12. 1972

    Search strategy. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  13. 1973

    Fig 1 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  14. 1974

    GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  15. 1975

    Fig 4 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  16. 1976

    Difference in GMT for HPV16 and HPV18 in PWH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  17. 1977

    Fig 3 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  18. 1978

    Summary of characteristics of studies reviewed. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  19. 1979

    Cumulative meta-analysis. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
  20. 1980

    Summary of immunogenicity information. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

    Published 2024
    “…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”