Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
2581
DataSheet1_Cross-National Trends in Early Sexual Initiation Among 15-Year-Old Adolescents, 2002–2022.xlsx
Published 2025“…Girls and less affluent adolescents had lower odds of early initiation. Parental support (and its interaction with time) also had a significant but small protective role.…”
-
2582
Table2_The incidence, mortality and disease burden of cardiovascular diseases in China: a comparative study with the United States and Japan based on the GBD 2019 time trend analys...
Published 2024“…Compared with the US and Japan, from 1990 to 2019, the CVDs incidence rate in China showed an increasing trend, with a lower annual decrease in ASDR and a younger age structure of disease burden. …”
-
2583
Table1_The incidence, mortality and disease burden of cardiovascular diseases in China: a comparative study with the United States and Japan based on the GBD 2019 time trend analys...
Published 2024“…Compared with the US and Japan, from 1990 to 2019, the CVDs incidence rate in China showed an increasing trend, with a lower annual decrease in ASDR and a younger age structure of disease burden. …”
-
2584
Table3_The incidence, mortality and disease burden of cardiovascular diseases in China: a comparative study with the United States and Japan based on the GBD 2019 time trend analys...
Published 2024“…Compared with the US and Japan, from 1990 to 2019, the CVDs incidence rate in China showed an increasing trend, with a lower annual decrease in ASDR and a younger age structure of disease burden. …”
-
2585
Table 1_Student wellbeing during COVID-19—Impact of individual characteristics, learning behavior, teaching quality, school system-related aspects and home learning environment.pdf...
Published 2025“…Introduction<p>The measures taken to contain the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the lives of young people. Studies indicate a decrease in wellbeing and an increase in mental health problems among adolescents. …”
-
2586
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2587
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2588
Table 1_Microbial diversity and composition in the gut microbiome of patients during systemic inflammatory response syndrome: can we use gut bacteria as potential biomarkers to cha...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>During early AT, alpha diversity (Shannon index) was significantly lower in sepsis patients compared to non-sepsis patients (2.48 vs. 3.0, p = 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed after prolonged treatment (2.65 vs. 2.89, p = 0.58). …”
-
2589
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2590
Table2_Cuproptosis-related lncRNAs emerge as a novel signature for predicting prognosis in prostate carcinoma and functional experimental validation.docx
Published 2024“…SNHG9 knockdown resulted in a significant increase in G1 phase cells and a decrease in S and G2 phases, indicating inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. …”
-
2591
Table_1_Elevated serum albumin-to-creatinine ratio as a protective factor on clinical outcomes among critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective study.DOCX
Published 2024“…Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated that patients with higher ACR had a significantly lower risk of 30−/60-day mortality (log-rank p < 0.001). …”
-
2592
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2593
Table1_Cuproptosis-related lncRNAs emerge as a novel signature for predicting prognosis in prostate carcinoma and functional experimental validation.docx
Published 2024“…SNHG9 knockdown resulted in a significant increase in G1 phase cells and a decrease in S and G2 phases, indicating inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. …”
-
2594
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2595
Supplementary Material for: Global, Regional, and National Burden of Neonatal Encephalopathy Due to Birth Asphyxia and Trauma, Its Attributable Risk Factors, 1990-2021: Results fro...
Published 2025“…Globally, NEBAT-related mortality cases and rates declined in most countries, while a few countries like Ethiopia saw a significant rise in both. Regions with lower SDI were associated with higher trends of NEBAT prevalence and mortality growth. …”
-
2596
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2597
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2598
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
2599
Data Sheet 1_Clinical predictors and concomitant antiseizure medications effects on seizure control in relation to plasma cenobamate concentration: a multicenter retrospective stud...
Published 2025“…Among responders, 53.8% (14/26) achieved response on ≤100 mg/day, with CNBp of 0.5–17.6 μg/mL (median ∼5–6 μg/mL). There was no significant relationship between age and gender, although there was a statistically significant correlation between CNBp and BMI (p = 0.038; R2 = 0.157). …”
-
2600
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”