Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
3501
Marginal effect of HTD on income and SWB.
Published 2025“…We take advantage of 40 years of variation in daily land surface temperature data, finding that one additional exceptionally hot day significantly lowers wellbeing, by roughly 0.5% on average. …”
-
3502
Estimation procedure flow-chart.
Published 2025“…We take advantage of 40 years of variation in daily land surface temperature data, finding that one additional exceptionally hot day significantly lowers wellbeing, by roughly 0.5% on average. …”
-
3503
Structural model outline.
Published 2025“…We take advantage of 40 years of variation in daily land surface temperature data, finding that one additional exceptionally hot day significantly lowers wellbeing, by roughly 0.5% on average. …”
-
3504
-
3505
OVX educes bone density of femur.
Published 2025“…Compared to Sham rats, OVX tats had a significant decrease in bone mass and impaired bone micro structure: (L) BMD, (M) BV, (N) BV/TV, (O) Tb.N,(P) Tb.Sp, and (Q) Tb.Th. …”
-
3506
-
3507
<b> </b> Energy efficiency and gas volume comparison.
Published 2025“…CO₂ yield was higher in the control group at lower temperatures, while the integrated system consistently produced more biochar and biogas. …”
-
3508
Model validation of kinetic parameters.
Published 2025“…CO₂ yield was higher in the control group at lower temperatures, while the integrated system consistently produced more biochar and biogas. …”
-
3509
A Hydrate-Bearing Sediment Gas Replacement Mechanical Behavior Regulation Mechanism and Slope Stability Analysis
Published 2025“…The Ψ value on the <i>v</i>-ln <i>p</i>′ plane is consistently negative, and gas replacement results in higher ln <i>p</i>′ values and lower <i>v</i> at the failure state point. As saturation increases, the Γ value of the critical state line decreases, while the λ value increases. (3) For slope simulations, increased hydrate saturation significantly raises the safety factor for gentler slopes, while the reinforcing effect of gas replacement is weaker for steeper slopes with higher saturation.…”
-
3510
A Hydrate-Bearing Sediment Gas Replacement Mechanical Behavior Regulation Mechanism and Slope Stability Analysis
Published 2025“…The Ψ value on the <i>v</i>-ln <i>p</i>′ plane is consistently negative, and gas replacement results in higher ln <i>p</i>′ values and lower <i>v</i> at the failure state point. As saturation increases, the Γ value of the critical state line decreases, while the λ value increases. (3) For slope simulations, increased hydrate saturation significantly raises the safety factor for gentler slopes, while the reinforcing effect of gas replacement is weaker for steeper slopes with higher saturation.…”
-
3511
Dataset visualization diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3512
Dataset sample images.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3513
Performance comparison of different models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3514
C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3515
YOLOv8n detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3516
YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3517
BiFormer structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3518
YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3519
GSConv module structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
3520
Performance comparison of three loss functions.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”