Search alternatives:
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1081
Flow chart of data screening and analysis.
Published 2025“…In contrast, the BMD, BV/TV, and Tb.N in the 12-week model group exhibited a modest but non-significant decrease relative to the 9-week model group. …”
-
1082
-
1083
-
1084
Table 2_Predicting ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection outcomes using sequencing-based early microbiological response: a proof-of-concept prospective study.docx
Published 2025“…Objectives<p>Ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTIs) cause significant mortality. …”
-
1085
Image 1_Predicting ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection outcomes using sequencing-based early microbiological response: a proof-of-concept prospective study.tif
Published 2025“…Objectives<p>Ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTIs) cause significant mortality. …”
-
1086
Table 3_Predicting ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection outcomes using sequencing-based early microbiological response: a proof-of-concept prospective study.docx
Published 2025“…Objectives<p>Ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTIs) cause significant mortality. …”
-
1087
Table 1_Predicting ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infection outcomes using sequencing-based early microbiological response: a proof-of-concept prospective study.doc
Published 2025“…Objectives<p>Ventilator-associated lower respiratory tract infections (VA-LRTIs) cause significant mortality. …”
-
1088
The correlogram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”
-
1089
The food consumption quantity.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”
-
1090
Dataset.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”
-
1091
-
1092
-
1093
-
1094
-
1095
-
1096
-
1097
Individual data.
Published 2025“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”
-
1098
Descriptive statistics.
Published 2025“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”
-
1099
Time matched metabolic cost.
Published 2025“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”
-
1100
Research design.
Published 2025“…Average oxygen consumption (VO2) was significantly lower (2.36 mL/kg/min) with the exoskeleton (t = 2.81; p = 0.023), and peak VO2 was 3.33 mL/kg/min lower with the exoskeleton (t = 2.37; p = 0.045). …”