Showing 1,761 - 1,780 results of 4,639 for search 'significantly ((((lower decrease) OR (teer decrease))) OR (linear decrease))', query time: 0.38s Refine Results
  1. 1761
  2. 1762
  3. 1763

    Descriptive statistics and variable definitions. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  4. 1764

    The results of endogenous analysis. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  5. 1765

    Correlation test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  6. 1766

    S1 Dataset - by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  7. 1767

    The mediation of confidence. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  8. 1768

    Robustness test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  9. 1769

    The effects of consumption inequality on SWB. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  10. 1770
  11. 1771

    Baseline characteristics. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  12. 1772

    Data ste. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  13. 1773

    Comparison of post-experimental outcome measures. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  14. 1774
  15. 1775
  16. 1776
  17. 1777
  18. 1778

    S1 File - by Kathleen Kristensen (17525457)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Participants had significantly lower odds (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.65) of reporting difficulty in accessing syringes later in the pandemic. …”
  19. 1779

    Chicago COVID-19 mitigation policy timeline. by Kathleen Kristensen (17525457)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Participants had significantly lower odds (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.65) of reporting difficulty in accessing syringes later in the pandemic. …”
  20. 1780

    Demographic and ocular features. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the PCG group, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA levels were notably higher than in controls (p < 0.001, <i><i>p</i> </i>= 0.020), while TAS levels were significantly lower (p = 0.043). Adjusting for age and gender, the serum TAS (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.85, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.037), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.35, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) and MDA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.034) were determined to be independent risk/protective factors for PCG. …”