Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1921
-
1922
-
1923
-
1924
Age-related correlation of PBMCs percentages in comparison between males and females.
Published 2024“…<p>Only cells/groups with significant p-values are shown. Additional data are presented in S1 Fig 5 in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0300946#pone.0300946.s001" target="_blank">S1 File</a>. …”
-
1925
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1926
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1927
-
1928
-
1929
-
1930
Sociodemographic data of the sample.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1931
Flowchart of the study.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1932
Bandages: KT (3A) and RT (3B).
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1933
ANOVA repeated measures of the variables.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1934
Dataset.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1935
CONSORT Flow Diagram.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1936
-
1937
Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS.
Published 2025“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
-
1938
Classification of hand grip strength.
Published 2025“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
-
1939
Rating scale for functional severity [28].
Published 2025“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”
-
1940
Regression model coefficients.
Published 2025“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”