Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
2321
Opioid consumption data.
Published 2025“…Mean percent reduction in prescription size was greater in the Orthopaedic Surgery cohort (45% versus 38%) (p = .002). …”
-
2322
Prescription data.
Published 2025“…Mean percent reduction in prescription size was greater in the Orthopaedic Surgery cohort (45% versus 38%) (p = .002). …”
-
2323
Refill rate by surgical specialty.
Published 2025“…Mean percent reduction in prescription size was greater in the Orthopaedic Surgery cohort (45% versus 38%) (p = .002). …”
-
2324
Noncontinuous data on opioid use.
Published 2025“…Mean percent reduction in prescription size was greater in the Orthopaedic Surgery cohort (45% versus 38%) (p = .002). …”
-
2325
-
2326
-
2327
S1 Table -
Published 2024“…From the cumulative total number of acoustic emission ringing counts, it can be seen that during the loading process, the total number of acoustic emission ringing in fissured rock masses subjected to hydraulic pressure is significantly lower than that of specimens without hydraulic pressure, and the trend is also relatively stable.…”
-
2328
Characteristic curve of damage variable stage.
Published 2024“…From the cumulative total number of acoustic emission ringing counts, it can be seen that during the loading process, the total number of acoustic emission ringing in fissured rock masses subjected to hydraulic pressure is significantly lower than that of specimens without hydraulic pressure, and the trend is also relatively stable.…”
-
2329
Stress-strain and hydraulic pressure curves.
Published 2024“…From the cumulative total number of acoustic emission ringing counts, it can be seen that during the loading process, the total number of acoustic emission ringing in fissured rock masses subjected to hydraulic pressure is significantly lower than that of specimens without hydraulic pressure, and the trend is also relatively stable.…”
-
2330
CAD drawing of sealing fixture.
Published 2024“…From the cumulative total number of acoustic emission ringing counts, it can be seen that during the loading process, the total number of acoustic emission ringing in fissured rock masses subjected to hydraulic pressure is significantly lower than that of specimens without hydraulic pressure, and the trend is also relatively stable.…”
-
2331
-
2332
-
2333
Univariate analyses.
Published 2025“…Multiple linear regression with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) modelling was used to identify factors associated with mean monthly ED visits. Multivariate analysis showed the mean monthly ED visits increased significantly during the first year of COVID-19 than before the pandemic (Mean = 0.30 vs Mean = 0.21, p = 0.01). …”
-
2334
Overview of individuals in the study.
Published 2025“…Multiple linear regression with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) modelling was used to identify factors associated with mean monthly ED visits. Multivariate analysis showed the mean monthly ED visits increased significantly during the first year of COVID-19 than before the pandemic (Mean = 0.30 vs Mean = 0.21, p = 0.01). …”
-
2335
Multivariate analyses.
Published 2025“…Multiple linear regression with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) modelling was used to identify factors associated with mean monthly ED visits. Multivariate analysis showed the mean monthly ED visits increased significantly during the first year of COVID-19 than before the pandemic (Mean = 0.30 vs Mean = 0.21, p = 0.01). …”
-
2336
-
2337
-
2338
-
2339
-
2340