Showing 2,321 - 2,340 results of 11,357 for search 'significantly ((((lower decrease) OR (we decrease))) OR (((mean decrease) OR (greater decrease))))', query time: 0.56s Refine Results
  1. 2321

    Opioid consumption data. by Wali U. Pirzada (22278071)

    Published 2025
    “…Mean percent reduction in prescription size was greater in the Orthopaedic Surgery cohort (45% versus 38%) (p = .002). …”
  2. 2322

    Prescription data. by Wali U. Pirzada (22278071)

    Published 2025
    “…Mean percent reduction in prescription size was greater in the Orthopaedic Surgery cohort (45% versus 38%) (p = .002). …”
  3. 2323

    Refill rate by surgical specialty. by Wali U. Pirzada (22278071)

    Published 2025
    “…Mean percent reduction in prescription size was greater in the Orthopaedic Surgery cohort (45% versus 38%) (p = .002). …”
  4. 2324

    Noncontinuous data on opioid use. by Wali U. Pirzada (22278071)

    Published 2025
    “…Mean percent reduction in prescription size was greater in the Orthopaedic Surgery cohort (45% versus 38%) (p = .002). …”
  5. 2325
  6. 2326
  7. 2327

    S1 Table - by Jiajun Zeng (8854859)

    Published 2024
    “…From the cumulative total number of acoustic emission ringing counts, it can be seen that during the loading process, the total number of acoustic emission ringing in fissured rock masses subjected to hydraulic pressure is significantly lower than that of specimens without hydraulic pressure, and the trend is also relatively stable.…”
  8. 2328

    Characteristic curve of damage variable stage. by Jiajun Zeng (8854859)

    Published 2024
    “…From the cumulative total number of acoustic emission ringing counts, it can be seen that during the loading process, the total number of acoustic emission ringing in fissured rock masses subjected to hydraulic pressure is significantly lower than that of specimens without hydraulic pressure, and the trend is also relatively stable.…”
  9. 2329

    Stress-strain and hydraulic pressure curves. by Jiajun Zeng (8854859)

    Published 2024
    “…From the cumulative total number of acoustic emission ringing counts, it can be seen that during the loading process, the total number of acoustic emission ringing in fissured rock masses subjected to hydraulic pressure is significantly lower than that of specimens without hydraulic pressure, and the trend is also relatively stable.…”
  10. 2330

    CAD drawing of sealing fixture. by Jiajun Zeng (8854859)

    Published 2024
    “…From the cumulative total number of acoustic emission ringing counts, it can be seen that during the loading process, the total number of acoustic emission ringing in fissured rock masses subjected to hydraulic pressure is significantly lower than that of specimens without hydraulic pressure, and the trend is also relatively stable.…”
  11. 2331
  12. 2332
  13. 2333

    Univariate analyses. by Zachary E. M. Giovannini-Green (22008277)

    Published 2025
    “…Multiple linear regression with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) modelling was used to identify factors associated with mean monthly ED visits. Multivariate analysis showed the mean monthly ED visits increased significantly during the first year of COVID-19 than before the pandemic (Mean = 0.30 vs Mean = 0.21, p = 0.01). …”
  14. 2334

    Overview of individuals in the study. by Zachary E. M. Giovannini-Green (22008277)

    Published 2025
    “…Multiple linear regression with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) modelling was used to identify factors associated with mean monthly ED visits. Multivariate analysis showed the mean monthly ED visits increased significantly during the first year of COVID-19 than before the pandemic (Mean = 0.30 vs Mean = 0.21, p = 0.01). …”
  15. 2335

    Multivariate analyses. by Zachary E. M. Giovannini-Green (22008277)

    Published 2025
    “…Multiple linear regression with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) modelling was used to identify factors associated with mean monthly ED visits. Multivariate analysis showed the mean monthly ED visits increased significantly during the first year of COVID-19 than before the pandemic (Mean = 0.30 vs Mean = 0.21, p = 0.01). …”
  16. 2336
  17. 2337
  18. 2338
  19. 2339
  20. 2340