Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
2141
-
2142
Data Sheet 1_Statistics and behavior of clinically significant extra-pulmonary vein atrial fibrillation sources: machine-learning-enhanced electrographic flow mapping in persistent...
Published 2025“…Notably, the majority of significant sources were not continuously active; however, when these sources switched “ON,” the spatial variability of AF cycle lengths in the respective atrium decreased by more than 50%, suggesting an entraining effect.…”
-
2143
-
2144
Participant demographics.
Published 2025“…We found that paced nostril breathing both decreased alpha/mu oscillations over central and parietal areas and increased frontal midline and occipital theta oscillations when comparing to spontaneous breathing. …”
-
2145
Theta power for frontal midline ROI.
Published 2025“…We found that paced nostril breathing both decreased alpha/mu oscillations over central and parietal areas and increased frontal midline and occipital theta oscillations when comparing to spontaneous breathing. …”
-
2146
Variables name and variable measurement.
Published 2025“…Using the medical insurance records from 2017 to 2022, we evaluated the impact of the DRG system on medical costs, service efficiency and healthcare quality.…”
-
2147
-
2148
Descriptive statistics and variable definitions.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2149
The results of endogenous analysis.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2150
Correlation test.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2151
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2152
The mediation of confidence.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2153
Robustness test.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2154
The effects of consumption inequality on SWB.
Published 2024“…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
-
2155
-
2156
The raw data for Fig 4.
Published 2025“…Luciferase assay and human and mouse brain multi-omics data show that, during the differentiation of OL precursor cells (OPCs) into OLs, the enhancer activity of Sox10-E1 does not change while that of Sox10-E2 decreases significantly. Chromatin interaction data indicate that the two <i>Sox10</i> enhancers lie close to the border of the <i>Sox10</i> topologically associating domain (TAD). …”
-
2157
The raw data for S2 Fig.
Published 2025“…Luciferase assay and human and mouse brain multi-omics data show that, during the differentiation of OL precursor cells (OPCs) into OLs, the enhancer activity of Sox10-E1 does not change while that of Sox10-E2 decreases significantly. Chromatin interaction data indicate that the two <i>Sox10</i> enhancers lie close to the border of the <i>Sox10</i> topologically associating domain (TAD). …”
-
2158
Questionnaire description.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Background</p><p>During the last decades, intensive care unit (ICU) mortality rates have significantly decreased but this progress has come with unintended consequences for patients and their caregivers. …”
-
2159
The raw data for Fig 6.
Published 2025“…Luciferase assay and human and mouse brain multi-omics data show that, during the differentiation of OL precursor cells (OPCs) into OLs, the enhancer activity of Sox10-E1 does not change while that of Sox10-E2 decreases significantly. Chromatin interaction data indicate that the two <i>Sox10</i> enhancers lie close to the border of the <i>Sox10</i> topologically associating domain (TAD). …”
-
2160
The raw data for S4 Fig.
Published 2025“…Luciferase assay and human and mouse brain multi-omics data show that, during the differentiation of OL precursor cells (OPCs) into OLs, the enhancer activity of Sox10-E1 does not change while that of Sox10-E2 decreases significantly. Chromatin interaction data indicate that the two <i>Sox10</i> enhancers lie close to the border of the <i>Sox10</i> topologically associating domain (TAD). …”