Showing 6,081 - 6,100 results of 18,571 for search 'significantly ((((mean decrease) OR (greater decrease))) OR (((we decrease) OR (a decrease))))', query time: 0.68s Refine Results
  1. 6081

    Combination of intraperitoneal and intratumoral administration of vitamin D3 is more effective in reducing the EAC tumor volume compared to just i.p. administration: by Vidya G. Bettada (22208808)

    Published 2025
    “…Ki67 on the other hand showed a significant reduction in the expression in the i.p & i.t treated vitamin D3 group. 7D. …”
  2. 6082

    Testing set error. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  3. 6083

    Internal structure of an LSTM cell. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  4. 6084

    Prediction effect of each model after STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  5. 6085

    The kernel density plot for data of each feature. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  6. 6086

    Analysis of raw data prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  7. 6087

    Flowchart of the STL. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  8. 6088

    SARIMA predicts season components. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  9. 6089

    BWO-BiLSTM model prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  10. 6090

    Bi-LSTM architecture diagram. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  11. 6091

    STL Linear Combination Forecast Graph. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  12. 6092

    LOSS curves for BWO-BiLSTM model training. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  13. 6093

    Analysis of STL-PCA prediction results. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  14. 6094

    Accumulated contribution rate of PCA. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  15. 6095

    Figure of ablation experiment. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  16. 6096

    Flowchart of the STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM model. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  17. 6097

    Parameter optimization results of BiLSTM. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  18. 6098

    Descriptive statistical analysis of data. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  19. 6099

    The MAE value of the model under raw data. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”
  20. 6100

    Three error values under raw data. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…First, seven benchmark models including Prophet, ARIMA, and LSTM were applied to raw price series, where results demonstrated that deep learning models significantly outperformed traditional methods. Subsequently, STL decomposition decoupled the series into trend, seasonal, and residual components for component-specific modeling, achieving a 22.6% reduction in average MAE compared to raw data modeling. …”