Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1161
Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA).
Published 2025“…Analysis of bacterial abundance revealed a shift in trends as the disease combined from control to NSESKD and SESKD group, respectively, across 7 genera: <i><i>Actinobacillus</i></i>, <i>TM7x</i>, <i><i>Capnocytophaga</i></i>, <i><i>Neisseria</i></i>, and <i><i>Leptotrichia</i></i> increased in abundance, while <i><i>Actinomyces</i></i> and <i><i>Atopobium</i></i> decreased. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) identified <i><i>Leptotrichia</i></i> as a potential biomarker for ESKD (both with and without sarcopenia).…”
-
1162
Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Soot Formation in the Laminar to Turbulent Transition of an Acetylene Diffusion Flame
Published 2025“…Results from different regimes indicate the following: (1) In the laminar state, <i>ṁ</i><sub>soot</sub> increased linearly with <i>Re</i>, with a growth rate positively correlated with the tube diameter. (2) After entering the transitional state, <i>ṁ</i><sub>soot</sub> decreased exponentially by over 95%; <i>T</i> gradually increased by 150 K; and both SPL and the standard deviation of <i>T</i> (σ<sub><i>T</i></sub>) initially rose and then declined. (3) After entering the fully turbulent state, SPL increased again whereas σ<sub><i>T</i></sub> stabilized at 14. …”
-
1163
-
1164
-
1165
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…The TNC and ACTM100 groups also showed greater (<i>P</i> < 0.05) feed efficiency, tibia length, tibia zinc content, and hepatic SOD1 expression but exhibited reduced (<i>P</i> < 0.05) hepatic NF-kB expression. …”
-
1166
Row data.
Published 2025“…Moreover, Life Sciences & Medicine students demonstrated a greater tendency toward negative self-perception, low psychological well-being level, and decreased creative self-efficacy, compared to peers in other disciplines.…”
-
1167
Mexican warning label system.
Published 2024“…Similarly, the FOPWL decreased the perceived healthiness of both nectar with “excess sugars” and nectar with NNS. …”
-
1168
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…Similarly, the FOPWL decreased the perceived healthiness of both nectar with “excess sugars” and nectar with NNS. …”
-
1169
Images with FOPWL by time of data collection.
Published 2024“…Similarly, the FOPWL decreased the perceived healthiness of both nectar with “excess sugars” and nectar with NNS. …”
-
1170
Effects of increasing amounts of gravel on escape latency and aversiveness of gravel.
Published 2025“…Over five trials, latency significantly decreased in the 20 and 40 g groups. *p < 0.05 refers to effect of trial and ****p < 0.0001 refers to effect of group. …”
-
1171
-
1172
-
1173
Benchmark regression results.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
1174
Heterogeneity test.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
1175
S1 File -
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
1176
The robustness test.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
1177
Mechanistic testing.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
1178
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
1179
Endogenous treatment.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”
-
1180
Analysis of industry linkage effects.
Published 2024“…The findings reveal that: (1) At this stage, digital transformation in listed companies effectively reduces their carbon intensity, but the relationship between the two is not linear; instead, it exhibits a U-shaped trajectory, initially decreasing then increasing. (2) Analysis of mechanism indicates that costs associated with environmental governance and innovations in green technology serve as critical pathways through which corporate digital transformation influences carbon intensity. (3) The analysis of driving effect suggests that the digital transformation significantly curtails the carbon emission intensity of both upstream and downstream enterprises as well as those within the same industry and geographical region, through industrial linkage and the cohort effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis elucidates that the digital transformation of enterprises in regions with stronger government environmental regulations has a markedly more pronounced effect on reducing the carbon emission intensity. …”