Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1221
Performance comparison of ML models.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1222
Comparative data of different soil samples.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1223
Confusion matrix of random forest model.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1224
Sensor value scenario for fuzzy logic algorithm.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1225
Evaluation metrics of selected ML models.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1226
Block diagram of the proposed system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1227
Chart for applicable amount of fertilizers.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1228
Cost analysis of irrigation controller unit.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1229
Run times of two algorithms.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1230
-
1231
Flow chart of Fuzzy Logic based control system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1232
Block diagram for IoT-based irrigation system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1233
Flow chart of Average Value-based control system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1234
Hardware design for IoT-based irrigation system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
1235
-
1236
-
1237
Characteristics of the study subjects (N = 39).
Published 2025“…EELV increased in PL (+ 0.7 mL/kg PBW), PR (+2.0), and AR (+2.8), but decreased in AL (−2.3) (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001). In the bilateral protocol (n = 10, 70% male; 23.6 ± 3.2 years), regional ventilation showed no significant effects of position, ROI, or interaction (<i><i>p</i></i> > 0.05). …”
-
1238
Flowchart of study.
Published 2025“…EELV increased in PL (+ 0.7 mL/kg PBW), PR (+2.0), and AR (+2.8), but decreased in AL (−2.3) (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001). In the bilateral protocol (n = 10, 70% male; 23.6 ± 3.2 years), regional ventilation showed no significant effects of position, ROI, or interaction (<i><i>p</i></i> > 0.05). …”
-
1239
-
1240
Minimal data set.
Published 2025“…Results indicated that both the DFAT and DFAT + bFGF groups exhibited significantly reduced glottic gaps, increased collagen deposition, and decreased TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells compared to controls. …”