Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
241
-
242
Balance test results.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
243
Variables.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
244
Results of the parallel trend test.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
245
Results of the exclusion of other policies.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
246
Results of robustness tests.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
247
Descriptive statistical of variables.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
248
Baseline regression results.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
249
The results of mediating mechanism test.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
250
The results of Bootstrap Method and Sobel Test.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
251
Impact of the NAMR on CSR dimensions (E, S, G).
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
252
-
253
A summary of the dogs used to detect sleep disturbances with PLUS CYCLE<sup>®</sup>.
Published 2025Subjects: -
254
-
255
-
256
-
257
-
258
The Vancouver Scar Scale.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
259
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
260
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”