Showing 241 - 260 results of 18,449 for search 'significantly ((((step decrease) OR (((we decrease) OR (a decrease))))) OR (observed decrease))', query time: 0.57s Refine Results
  1. 241
  2. 242

    Balance test results. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  3. 243

    Variables. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  4. 244

    Results of the parallel trend test. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  5. 245

    Results of the exclusion of other policies. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  6. 246

    Results of robustness tests. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  7. 247

    Descriptive statistical of variables. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  8. 248

    Baseline regression results. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  9. 249

    The results of mediating mechanism test. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  10. 250

    The results of Bootstrap Method and Sobel Test. by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  11. 251

    Impact of the NAMR on CSR dimensions (E, S, G). by Le Zhu (1771669)

    Published 2025
    “…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
  12. 252
  13. 253
  14. 254
  15. 255
  16. 256
  17. 257
  18. 258

    The Vancouver Scar Scale. by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
  19. 259

    S1 Dataset - by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
  20. 260

    Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). by Na Wang (193263)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”