Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
6861
C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6862
YOLOv8n detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6863
YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6864
BiFormer structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6865
YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6866
GSConv module structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6867
Performance comparison of three loss functions.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6868
mAP0.5 Curves of various models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6869
Network loss function change diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6870
Comparative diagrams of different indicators.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6871
YOLOv8n structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6872
Geometric model of the binocular system.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6873
Enhanced dataset sample images.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
6874
Table 1_Microplastics in focus: a silent disruptor of liver health- a systematic review.docx
Published 2025“…Six investigations using pluripotent-stem-cell-derived liver organoids confirmed and expanded upon these findings, demonstrating that both pristine and aged PS-MPs (1–10 µm) disrupt sulfur amino acid and iron homeostasis (e.g., increased serum cysteine, decreased hepatic cysteine, and disturbed homocysteine metabolism), impair mitochondrial bioenergetics, and lead to significant lipid accumulation after exposures lasting up to 500 h. …”
-
6875
Test materials and test methods.
Published 2025“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”
-
6876
Proportions of test specimens.
Published 2025“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”
-
6877
Basic physical properties of red sandstone soil.
Published 2025“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”
-
6878
Main performance indicators of BF.
Published 2025“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”
-
6879
Technical parameters of cement.
Published 2025“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”
-
6880
Particle composition of red sandstone soil.
Published 2025“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”