Table 1_Projections of population exposure to hot and dry events in the end of the 21st century on the Iberian Peninsula.docx by Virgílio A. Bento (12659133)

“…Two representative concentration pathways (RCPs), specifically RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, are considered to represent distinct greenhouse gas emission scenarios. This research reveals a significant projected increase in population exposure to both drought and warm months across the entire IP by the century’s end, with climate change identified as the primary driver of this escalation. …”

Parallel trend test. by Wei Wang (17594)

“…After the policy was implemented (with a positive relative time), the regression coefficient increased significantly and reached a peak at a relative time of 3, and then decreased slightly. …”

Data Sheet 1_The relationship between intrinsic capacity and sarcopenia in middle-aged and older Chinese populations: the mediating influence of a novel nutritional index.zip by Hong Ding (135247)

“…Higher TCBI was associated with a 28% decrease in sarcopenia risk per unit increase (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58–0.90, p = 0.004). …”

Table 1_Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in preventing postoperative seizures in adult patients with brain tumors: a meta-analysis.docx by Yongyi Zhang (1800337)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of levetiracetam was superior to that of sodium valproate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39–0.72, p < 0.0001) and phenytoin sodium (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.62, p = 0.0004). No statistically significant difference in the efficacy of early seizure prophylaxis (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15–2.04, p = 0.37) was observed. …”

Table 2_Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in preventing postoperative seizures in adult patients with brain tumors: a meta-analysis.docx by Yongyi Zhang (1800337)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of levetiracetam was superior to that of sodium valproate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39–0.72, p < 0.0001) and phenytoin sodium (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.62, p = 0.0004). No statistically significant difference in the efficacy of early seizure prophylaxis (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15–2.04, p = 0.37) was observed. …”

Image 3_Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in preventing postoperative seizures in adult patients with brain tumors: a meta-analysis.jpeg by Yongyi Zhang (1800337)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of levetiracetam was superior to that of sodium valproate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39–0.72, p < 0.0001) and phenytoin sodium (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.62, p = 0.0004). No statistically significant difference in the efficacy of early seizure prophylaxis (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15–2.04, p = 0.37) was observed. …”

Image 1_Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in preventing postoperative seizures in adult patients with brain tumors: a meta-analysis.tif by Yongyi Zhang (1800337)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of levetiracetam was superior to that of sodium valproate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39–0.72, p < 0.0001) and phenytoin sodium (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.62, p = 0.0004). No statistically significant difference in the efficacy of early seizure prophylaxis (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15–2.04, p = 0.37) was observed. …”

Image 2_Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in preventing postoperative seizures in adult patients with brain tumors: a meta-analysis.tif by Yongyi Zhang (1800337)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of levetiracetam was superior to that of sodium valproate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39–0.72, p < 0.0001) and phenytoin sodium (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.62, p = 0.0004). No statistically significant difference in the efficacy of early seizure prophylaxis (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15–2.04, p = 0.37) was observed. …”

Image 4_Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in preventing postoperative seizures in adult patients with brain tumors: a meta-analysis.tif by Yongyi Zhang (1800337)

“…Subgroup analyses revealed that the efficacy of levetiracetam was superior to that of sodium valproate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39–0.72, p < 0.0001) and phenytoin sodium (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.62, p = 0.0004). No statistically significant difference in the efficacy of early seizure prophylaxis (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15–2.04, p = 0.37) was observed. …”

Genetic evidence linking gastroesophageal reflux disease to chronic kidney disease and kidney failure: a two-step Mendelian randomization study by Fanghong Zheng (8931326)

“…Interventions with these factors could significantly decrease the burden of CKD attributable to GERD.…”

Supplementary file 3_Efficacy of Xiaoyao-san preparations in treating Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.docx by Chengna Wang (21535973)

“…</p>Methods<p>Eight databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing XYS preparations to a low-iodine diet (LID), selenium yeast (SY), levothyroxine (LT4), or Ophiocordyceps sinensis (OS) for HT treatment. …”

Supplementary file 2_Efficacy of Xiaoyao-san preparations in treating Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.zip by Chengna Wang (21535973)

“…</p>Methods<p>Eight databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing XYS preparations to a low-iodine diet (LID), selenium yeast (SY), levothyroxine (LT4), or Ophiocordyceps sinensis (OS) for HT treatment. …”

Supplementary file 1_Efficacy of Xiaoyao-san preparations in treating Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.zip by Chengna Wang (21535973)

“…</p>Methods<p>Eight databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing XYS preparations to a low-iodine diet (LID), selenium yeast (SY), levothyroxine (LT4), or Ophiocordyceps sinensis (OS) for HT treatment. …”

GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Funnel plot of VO_2Peak inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”