Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
11061
Endogenous test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
11062
Heterogeneity analysis results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
11063
Robustness test results.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
11064
Baseline results of the impact of RLM on HWSW.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
11065
The influencing factors of RLM.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
11066
Variable definitions and basic statistics.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
11067
Average and marginal effects of RLM on HWSW.
Published 2025“…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
-
11068
Thermal supply for each thermal supply unit.
Published 2025“…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
-
11069
The OCPP-P2G-CHP coupling relationship.
Published 2025“…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
-
11070
The provision of energy for carbon capture.
Published 2025“…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
-
11071
39-20-6 Integrated Energy System.
Published 2025“…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
-
11072
Power supply for each power supply unit.
Published 2025“…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
-
11073
Overall view of the slurry.
Published 2024“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
-
11074
Definitions of variables.
Published 2024“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
-
11075
Realistic structure diagram of testing equipment.
Published 2024“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
-
11076
Engineering geological cross section diagram.
Published 2024“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
-
11077
The equipped sensors on steel pipes.
Published 2024“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
-
11078
Close-up view of the slurry.
Published 2024“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
-
11079
The physical index properties of the loess.
Published 2024“…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
-
11080
Force analysis of soil differential element.
Published 2025“…Based on Duncan-Chang stress-strain model, this paper puts forward a relationship between friction angle and wall displacement ratio, which can consider both non-limit active state and non-limit passive state. …”