Showing 1,941 - 1,960 results of 4,380 for search 'significantly ((((teer decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (((greater decrease) OR (nn decrease))))', query time: 0.50s Refine Results
  1. 1941

    Structure diagram of ensemble model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  2. 1942

    Fitting formula parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  3. 1943

    Test plan. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  4. 1944

    Fitting surface parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  5. 1945

    Model generalisation validation error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  6. 1946

    Empirical model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  7. 1947

    Fitting curve parameters. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  8. 1948

    Test instrument. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  9. 1949

    Empirical model establishment process. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  10. 1950

    Model prediction error trend chart. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  11. 1951

    Basic physical parameters of red clay. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  12. 1952

    BP neural network structure diagram. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  13. 1953

    Structure diagram of GBDT model. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  14. 1954

    Model prediction error analysis index. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  15. 1955

    Fitting curve parameter table. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  16. 1956

    Model prediction error analysis. by Hongqi Wang (2208238)

    Published 2024
    “…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
  17. 1957
  18. 1958

    Complexity comparison of different models. by Li Yuan (102305)

    Published 2025
    “…Therefore, the study proposes a signal automatic modulation classification model based on fixed K-mean algorithm and denoising autoencoder. The model uses fixed K-mean algorithm for feature classification and optimizes median filtering algorithm using dynamic thresholding. …”
  19. 1959

    Dynamic window based median filtering algorithm. by Li Yuan (102305)

    Published 2025
    “…Therefore, the study proposes a signal automatic modulation classification model based on fixed K-mean algorithm and denoising autoencoder. The model uses fixed K-mean algorithm for feature classification and optimizes median filtering algorithm using dynamic thresholding. …”
  20. 1960

    Flow of operation of improved KMA. by Li Yuan (102305)

    Published 2025
    “…Therefore, the study proposes a signal automatic modulation classification model based on fixed K-mean algorithm and denoising autoencoder. The model uses fixed K-mean algorithm for feature classification and optimizes median filtering algorithm using dynamic thresholding. …”