Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
221
-
222
-
223
-
224
-
225
Mean amplitude values during a complete 360° rotation for the external oblique muscle.
Published 2024“…The values for the movement half-phase with decreasing load are mirrored to enable a direct comparison between both movement half-phases. …”
-
226
Mean amplitude values during a complete 360° rotation for the internal oblique muscle.
Published 2024“…The values for the movement half-phase with decreasing load are mirrored to enable a direct comparison between both movement half-phases. …”
-
227
Mean amplitude values during a complete 360° rotation for the rectus abdominis muscle.
Published 2024“…The values for the movement half-phase with decreasing load are mirrored to enable a direct comparison between both movement half-phases. …”
-
228
-
229
Results of significance for regression factors.
Published 2024“…Micro-cracks appeared in the cemented body by Day 7, resulting in a slight decrease in strength (3.92%) from Day 3 to Day 7. …”
-
230
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
231
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
232
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
233
-
234
-
235
-
236
-
237
-
238
-
239
-
240
A sample choice question with a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”