Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1981
-
1982
-
1983
-
1984
-
1985
-
1986
-
1987
-
1988
-
1989
Integration of Metabolomics, Transcriptomics, and 16s rRNA Sequencing Reveals the Mechanism of Morus alba <i>L.</i> (Sangzhi) Alkaloids (SZ-A) in Improving Cholesterol Metabolism i...
Published 2025“…The results showed that repeated treatment with 200 mg/kg SZ-A significantly decreased the total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the blood and increased the fecal content of two conjugated bile acids, taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA) and taurolithocholic acid (TLCA). …”
-
1990
-
1991
-
1992
-
1993
-
1994
-
1995
-
1996
-
1997
Mucosal turnover in the duodenum and the jejunum following different diets at T1 and T2 post-weaning periods.
Published 2025“…<p>IHC images (top row) showing a significant decrease in the number of cleaved-caspase-3 positive cells observed at T2 in the jejunum following PRE/PRO supplemented diet (B_20x) and an increase in Ki-67 positive cells following PRO supplementation (D_20x), compared to CTR (A and C, respectively_20x). …”
-
1998
-
1999
-
2000
Blood Pressure and LDL-C During Follow-up.
Published 2025“…The risk of cardiovascular death was significantly decreased (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41–0.998, <i>P</i> = 0.049) and the risk of fracture non-significantly increased (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.95–2.27, <i>P</i> = 0.08) in the intervention group compared to the control group.…”