Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
4701
Data Sheet 1_Global, regional, and national disease burden of tobacco-related Alzheimer’s disease among individuals over the age of 55: a global burden of disease study.docx
Published 2025“…It is anticipated that the burden will continue to gradually decrease from 2021 to 2040.</p>Conclusion<p>Although the global burden of tobacco-related Alzheimer’s disease among the older adults declined from 1990 to 2021, significant disparities existed across regions, age groups, sex, and SDI.…”
-
4702
Data Sheet 1_Synergistic remediation of continuous cropping obstacles in facility agriculture: insights from the Stropharia rugosoannulata-Ornamental Sunflower Rotation System.docx
Published 2025“…The SR-OS2 system significantly enhanced soil properties by increasing pH (+0.57 units), decreasing electrical conductivity (−37.56%), and boosting available phosphorus (+84.2%), while also shifting microbial communities toward bacterial dominance with a 37.4% increase in bacterial Chao1 diversity and a 39.1% decrease in fungal diversity, alongside strengthened bacterial connectivity (+42%) and reduced fungal modularity in co-occurrence networks. …”
-
4703
Image2_Multi-omics analysis provides insights into the mechanism underlying fruit color formation in Capsicum.tif
Published 2024“…In this study, the light-yellow color observed in immature CSJ009 fruits compared to CSJ010 could be attributed to decreased chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments. Through integrated analysis of the transcriptome and metabolome of CSJ009 and CSJ010, we identified 23,930 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and 345 differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs). …”
-
4704
Actual Vs predicted revenue.
Published 2025“…To address this challenge, we propose F-TransR, a Transformer-based multimodal revenue prediction model. …”
-
4705
Supplementary Material for: Streptococcus mutans GcrR regulates oral biofilm from a cariogenic state to a non-cariogenic state by affecting exopolysaccharides production and biofil...
Published 2025“…The orphan response regulator GcrR negatively regulates exopolysaccharides (EPSs) synthesis in S. mutans. We aimed to investigate the effect of GcrR on the cariogenicity of oral biofilms. …”
-
4706
Data_Sheet_1_Long-Term Overconsumption of Sugar Starting at Adolescence Produces Persistent Hyperactivity and Neurocognitive Deficits in Adulthood.PDF
Published 2025“…Using a well-validated mouse model of sugar consumption, we found that long-term sugar consumption, at a level that significantly augments weight gain, elicits an abnormal hyperlocomotor response to novelty and alters both episodic and spatial memory. …”
-
4707
Genetic evidence linking gastroesophageal reflux disease to chronic kidney disease and kidney failure: a two-step Mendelian randomization study
Published 2025“…Interventions with these factors could significantly decrease the burden of CKD attributable to GERD.…”
-
4708
None -
Published 2025“…<div><p>Malaria remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in developing countries. …”
-
4709
Image_1_Dietary soy protein reverses obesity-induced liver steatosis and alters fecal microbial composition independent of isoflavone level.JPEG
Published 2024“…HIF) did not affect any of these measurements except in the SPC-HIF group, which had an additional decrease in liver weight (p < 0.05) compared to the SPC-LIF group. …”
-
4710
Table_1_Dietary soy protein reverses obesity-induced liver steatosis and alters fecal microbial composition independent of isoflavone level.DOCX
Published 2024“…HIF) did not affect any of these measurements except in the SPC-HIF group, which had an additional decrease in liver weight (p < 0.05) compared to the SPC-LIF group. …”
-
4711
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4712
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4713
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4714
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4715
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4716
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4717
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4718
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4719
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
4720
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”