Performance comparison of different models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

BiFormer structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

GSConv module structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Performance comparison of three loss functions. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

mAP0.5 Curves of various models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Network loss function change diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Comparative diagrams of different indicators. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Geometric model of the binocular system. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Enhanced dataset sample images. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

GluA1 promotes opioid use by Yuan-Yuan Hou (11896051)

“…In rats with steady MSA, the protein level of GluA1 subunits of glutamate AMPA receptors (AMPARs) was significantly increased, but that of GluA2 was decreased, resulting in an increased GluA1/GluA2 ratio in central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA). …”

Test materials and test methods. by Yao Long (1604773)

“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”

Proportions of test specimens. by Yao Long (1604773)

“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”

Basic physical properties of red sandstone soil. by Yao Long (1604773)

“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”

Main performance indicators of BF. by Yao Long (1604773)

“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”

Technical parameters of cement. by Yao Long (1604773)

“…As the BF content increases, the UCS and peak deviatoric stress exhibit an initial increase followed by a decrease. At the optimal BF dosage of 6‰, the UCS improved 24.48% ~ 25.40%, while the peak deviatoric stress improved 31.13% ~ 39.48%. …”