Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 1,081 - 1,100 results of 2,079 for search 'significantly ((linear decrease) OR (((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease))))', query time: 0.50s Refine Results
  1. 1081

    Timeline for study enrollment. by Saeun Park (20410160)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Negative COVID-19 experiences were significantly associated with more severe depression and anxiety in Ugandan caregivers, regardless of their children’s malaria status. …”
  2. 1082

    Dataset used in the manuscript. by Saeun Park (20410160)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Negative COVID-19 experiences were significantly associated with more severe depression and anxiety in Ugandan caregivers, regardless of their children’s malaria status. …”
  3. 1083
  4. 1084
  5. 1085
  6. 1086
  7. 1087

    Channel pruning process. by Zhongjian Xie (4633099)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>After channel pruning, the algorithm model experiences a significant reduction in parameters and computational load, yet it may incur a decrease in accuracy. …”
  8. 1088

    Raw data underlying the findings in this study. by Andrew Mvula (20161161)

    Published 2024
    “…The relative bone density significantly decreased as standard length and condition factor (<i>K</i>) increased in both sexes. …”
  9. 1089
  10. 1090
  11. 1091

    Basic situation of different vegetation types. by Ye Xiao (3913402)

    Published 2025
    “…The largest total DOC stock was observed in EBF, while BF and EBF had significantly higher MBC and EOC stocks than SH, CFF, and MCBF (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
  12. 1092
  13. 1093

    Map showing the intervention and control LGAs. by Chinwe C. Eze (8787503)

    Published 2025
    “…However, post-intervention, the adjusted mean SARI Stigma Score significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of 37.72 (95% CI: 36.01–39.43, p < 0.000).…”
  14. 1094

    Consort diagram. by Chinwe C. Eze (8787503)

    Published 2025
    “…However, post-intervention, the adjusted mean SARI Stigma Score significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of 37.72 (95% CI: 36.01–39.43, p < 0.000).…”
  15. 1095

    Validation and predictive accuracy of the cerebrovascular model, by Hadi Esfandi (21387211)

    Published 2025
    “…This observation suggests that the myogenic response is potentially linearly potentiated with increasing WT; however, the decreased constriction ability of muscles in the sloped phase, is proven to be advantageous for the vasculature, as it prevents reduced blood flow in deeper layers at high ABNP values. …”
  16. 1096

    Balance test results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  17. 1097

    Mechanism analysis results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  18. 1098

    Endogenous test results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  19. 1099

    Heterogeneity analysis results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  20. 1100

    Robustness test results. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”