Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
901
-
902
-
903
-
904
Mean parameter values for the selected crops.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
905
Performance comparison of ML models.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
906
Comparative data of different soil samples.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
907
Confusion matrix of random forest model.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
908
Sensor value scenario for fuzzy logic algorithm.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
909
Evaluation metrics of selected ML models.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
910
Block diagram of the proposed system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
911
Chart for applicable amount of fertilizers.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
912
Cost analysis of irrigation controller unit.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
913
Run times of two algorithms.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
914
-
915
Flow chart of Fuzzy Logic based control system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
916
Block diagram for IoT-based irrigation system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
917
Flow chart of Average Value-based control system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
918
Hardware design for IoT-based irrigation system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
919
-
920
Characteristics of the study subjects (N = 39).
Published 2025“…EELV increased in PL (+ 0.7 mL/kg PBW), PR (+2.0), and AR (+2.8), but decreased in AL (−2.3) (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001). In the bilateral protocol (n = 10, 70% male; 23.6 ± 3.2 years), regional ventilation showed no significant effects of position, ROI, or interaction (<i><i>p</i></i> > 0.05). …”