Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
2161
Pile foundation section.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2162
Shearing force in the pressure zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2163
Strain-stress maps of vertical pile foundation.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2164
Displacement-inclination variation graph.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2165
Soil modeling and mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2166
Location of monitored piles.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2167
Axial force in the pressure zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2168
Pile-soil interaction.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2169
Bending moment in the tension zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2170
Sketch of forces on vertical and inclined piles.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2171
Displacement cloud maps.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2172
Morphing mesh.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2173
Bending moment in the pressure zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2174
Axial forces in the tension zone.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2175
VPF and VIPF.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that under identical loading conditions, the maximum displacement of the VIPF (20.63 mm) is 23.8% lower than that of the VPF (27.06 mm). The outer ring of inclined piles in the VIPF significantly enhances structural stiffness through spatial synergy, achieving uniform load distribution and effective redistribution of pile-body internal forces. …”
-
2176
MXene-Coated Liquid Metal Nanodroplet Aggregates
Published 2025“…In contrast to silicone-based composites containing LM droplets or MXene nanosheets alone, these MXene-LM-silicone-based composites exhibit an exponential increase in thermal and electrical conductivity with decreasing interfacial thickness with significantly lower LM volume fractions (25 vol %) while avoiding LM rupture and bleed-out. …”
-
2177
MXene-Coated Liquid Metal Nanodroplet Aggregates
Published 2025“…In contrast to silicone-based composites containing LM droplets or MXene nanosheets alone, these MXene-LM-silicone-based composites exhibit an exponential increase in thermal and electrical conductivity with decreasing interfacial thickness with significantly lower LM volume fractions (25 vol %) while avoiding LM rupture and bleed-out. …”
-
2178
MXene-Coated Liquid Metal Nanodroplet Aggregates
Published 2025“…In contrast to silicone-based composites containing LM droplets or MXene nanosheets alone, these MXene-LM-silicone-based composites exhibit an exponential increase in thermal and electrical conductivity with decreasing interfacial thickness with significantly lower LM volume fractions (25 vol %) while avoiding LM rupture and bleed-out. …”
-
2179
-
2180
Minimum data set used in the article.
Published 2025“…The average total phosphorus (TP) content in cropland soil was slightly higher than in forestland and significantly higher than in grassland. The weaker carbon-sequestration capacity of cropland soil resulted in notably lower C:N (10.13) and C:P (47.38) ratios compared to forestland and grassland. …”