Showing 1,921 - 1,940 results of 4,656 for search 'significantly ((lower decrease) OR (((teer decrease) OR (greater decrease))))', query time: 0.39s Refine Results
  1. 1921
  2. 1922
  3. 1923
  4. 1924
  5. 1925

    Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  6. 1926

    Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  7. 1927

    Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  8. 1928

    Results of RF algorithm screening factors. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  9. 1929

    Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  10. 1930

    Attitude towards NTDs in the study Area. by Uchechukwu M. Chukwuocha (6685790)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>Background</p><p>Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) continue to significantly impact marginalized communities, contributing to high morbidity, stigma, and social exclusion. …”
  11. 1931

    Dataset of results. by Uchechukwu M. Chukwuocha (6685790)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>Background</p><p>Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) continue to significantly impact marginalized communities, contributing to high morbidity, stigma, and social exclusion. …”
  12. 1932

    Respondents’ perception about the public artwork. by Uchechukwu M. Chukwuocha (6685790)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>Background</p><p>Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) continue to significantly impact marginalized communities, contributing to high morbidity, stigma, and social exclusion. …”
  13. 1933
  14. 1934
  15. 1935

    Qualitative changes in the implant subgroup. by Adela Klezlova (22608008)

    Published 2025
    “…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
  16. 1936

    Results of the colorimetric MTT test. by Adela Klezlova (22608008)

    Published 2025
    “…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
  17. 1937

    IOP fluctuation. by Adela Klezlova (22608008)

    Published 2025
    “…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
  18. 1938

    IOP fluctuation. by Adela Klezlova (22608008)

    Published 2025
    “…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”
  19. 1939
  20. 1940

    Data. by Michael C. Payne (2664379)

    Published 2025
    “…Similarly, semiannual MDA lowered Mf prevalence from 23.3% (CI, 21.4-25.4%) to 0.3% (CI, 0.1-0.7%). …”