Showing 1,901 - 1,920 results of 4,618 for search 'significantly ((lower decrease) OR (linear decrease))', query time: 0.42s Refine Results
  1. 1901

    Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ. by Zhanfeng Fan (20390992)

    Published 2024
    “…The stress-deformation model of the single uncoupled joint (g-λ model with λ ≥ 1) is employed to depict the nonlinearity of uncoupled joints, with a greater value of the parameter λ signifying a lower degree of non-linearity in the joint model curve. …”
  2. 1902
  3. 1903
  4. 1904
  5. 1905

    Achieving Improved Ion Swarm Shaping Based on Ion Leakage Control in Ion Mobility Spectrometry by Jiyao Wang (2121157)

    Published 2025
    “…Simulations and experiments demonstrate that precise voltage adjustments effectively minimize ion leakage, enhancing resolving power by 50% (reaching a maximum of 106), while the corresponding decrease in signal intensity follows the <i>I</i><sub>p</sub>–<i>R</i><sub>p</sub> linear relationship. …”
  6. 1906
  7. 1907
  8. 1908
  9. 1909

    Age-related correlation of PBMCs percentages in comparison between males and females. by Juliane F. Tampé (19976538)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>Only cells/groups with significant p-values are shown. Additional data are presented in S1 Fig 5 in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0300946#pone.0300946.s001" target="_blank">S1 File</a>. …”
  10. 1910

    Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    “…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
  11. 1911

    Criteria for study selection. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    “…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
  12. 1912
  13. 1913
  14. 1914
  15. 1915

    Sociodemographic data of the sample. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  16. 1916

    Flowchart of the study. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  17. 1917

    Bandages: KT (3A) and RT (3B). by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  18. 1918

    ANOVA repeated measures of the variables. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  19. 1919

    Dataset. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”
  20. 1920

    CONSORT Flow Diagram. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

    Published 2025
    “…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”