Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1901
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The stress-deformation model of the single uncoupled joint (g-λ model with λ ≥ 1) is employed to depict the nonlinearity of uncoupled joints, with a greater value of the parameter λ signifying a lower degree of non-linearity in the joint model curve. …”
-
1902
-
1903
-
1904
-
1905
Achieving Improved Ion Swarm Shaping Based on Ion Leakage Control in Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Published 2025“…Simulations and experiments demonstrate that precise voltage adjustments effectively minimize ion leakage, enhancing resolving power by 50% (reaching a maximum of 106), while the corresponding decrease in signal intensity follows the <i>I</i><sub>p</sub>–<i>R</i><sub>p</sub> linear relationship. …”
-
1906
-
1907
-
1908
-
1909
Age-related correlation of PBMCs percentages in comparison between males and females.
Published 2024“…<p>Only cells/groups with significant p-values are shown. Additional data are presented in S1 Fig 5 in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0300946#pone.0300946.s001" target="_blank">S1 File</a>. …”
-
1910
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1911
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1912
-
1913
-
1914
-
1915
Sociodemographic data of the sample.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1916
Flowchart of the study.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1917
Bandages: KT (3A) and RT (3B).
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1918
ANOVA repeated measures of the variables.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1919
Dataset.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
1920
CONSORT Flow Diagram.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”