Search alternatives:
significantly longer » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
significantly longer » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
longer decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
-
181
-
182
-
183
Effects of message content condition on outcomes.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The CI campaign had significantly higher perceived cultural relevance (M = 4.61) than the general audience (M = 3.64) or control (M = 3.66; p’s<0.05) campaigns. …”
-
184
Participant characteristics, N = 502.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The CI campaign had significantly higher perceived cultural relevance (M = 4.61) than the general audience (M = 3.64) or control (M = 3.66; p’s<0.05) campaigns. …”
-
185
Sample of study stimuli by content condition.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The CI campaign had significantly higher perceived cultural relevance (M = 4.61) than the general audience (M = 3.64) or control (M = 3.66; p’s<0.05) campaigns. …”
-
186
Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
187
Pseudo code for coupling model execution process.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
188
Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
189
Results of RF algorithm screening factors.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
190
Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
191
Raw data_clean.
Published 2025“…Conversely, being overweight or obese is associated with lower CRF, which can lead to decreased daily energy expenditure and reduced physical activity. …”
-
192
Experimental design.
Published 2025“…Conversely, being overweight or obese is associated with lower CRF, which can lead to decreased daily energy expenditure and reduced physical activity. …”
-
193
Characterization of the participants.
Published 2025“…Conversely, being overweight or obese is associated with lower CRF, which can lead to decreased daily energy expenditure and reduced physical activity. …”
-
194
-
195
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
196
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
197
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
198
Cox risk curve.
Published 2025“…Under different weather conditions, compared to sunny days, parking duration is longer during moderate rain, with the probability of vehicles departing decreased by 8.6%, whereas during heavy rain, parking duration is shorter, with the probability of vehicles departing increased by 3%. …”
-
199
Weather factor dummy variable.
Published 2025“…Under different weather conditions, compared to sunny days, parking duration is longer during moderate rain, with the probability of vehicles departing decreased by 8.6%, whereas during heavy rain, parking duration is shorter, with the probability of vehicles departing increased by 3%. …”
-
200
Day factor dummy variable.
Published 2025“…Under different weather conditions, compared to sunny days, parking duration is longer during moderate rain, with the probability of vehicles departing decreased by 8.6%, whereas during heavy rain, parking duration is shorter, with the probability of vehicles departing increased by 3%. …”