The relationship between the implementation of reader's workshop on MAP test result. (c2017)
This study examines the relationship between the implementation of the Reader’s Writer’s Workshop and Words Their Way and students’ results on the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test in reading comprehension and language usage over a two-year period at a private school in Beirut, Lebanon. Two r...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | masterThesis |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/7183 https://doi.org/10.26756/th.2018.34 http://libraries.lau.edu.lb/research/laur/terms-of-use/thesis.php |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study examines the relationship between the implementation of the Reader’s Writer’s Workshop and Words Their Way and students’ results on the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) test in reading comprehension and language usage over a two-year period at a private school in Beirut, Lebanon. Two research questions guided the study: How did the MAP results compare prior to and post implementation of the Reader’s Writer’s Workshop and Words Their Way? How can the relationship between these two programs and MAP testing be defined? This quantitative longitudinal study follows the same cohort of elementary students over a period of two years and examines their standardized testing scores pre, during, and post implementation of the programs. Results of data analysis using Microsoft Excel sheets were presented in graphs to indicate correlations. Results portrayed that 100% of student grades in the reading comprehension test increased from the first reporting period when compared to the last. The general trend for the language usage average is that there was a steady increase in the average from the period during Spring 2013 to Spring 2015. This signifies that the Reader’s Writer’s Workshop and Words their Way have a positive impact on MAP test results. The study provided feedback on school leadership decision to use these programs for improving teaching and learning. However, future studies are suggested to address the cultural bias of the test to deliver more credible conclusions. |
|---|