Evaluating the alignment between a mathematics curriculum and the national tests. (c2013)
Alignment between various components of a curriculum is one major criterion to evaluate the curriculum. This paper aims to study the alignment between the Lebanese national tests for the “Life Sciences” track of the secondary level and the Lebanese math curriculum. The structure, content, and object...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | masterThesis |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10725/3285 https://doi.org/10.26756/th.2013.51 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Alignment between various components of a curriculum is one major criterion to evaluate the curriculum. This paper aims to study the alignment between the Lebanese national tests for the “Life Sciences” track of the secondary level and the Lebanese math curriculum. The structure, content, and objectives of the Lebanese math national curriculum were qualitatively analyzed along with twelve national tests, and four model tests representing the intended math curriculum. The national tests and the model tests were analyzed quantitatively within a framework that accounted for their objectives and the TIMSS cognitive domains. Correlations between the test items of 6 sets of exams were calculated: The national test items and the model tests items, the national test items of the years 2001-2003 and those of the years 2010-2012, and the test items of the first session and the second session of the national tests. The quantitative analysis revealed an average correlation (r = 0.50) between the national tests and the model tests when the specific objectives and the cognitive domains were considered. However, a higher correlation was detected (r = 0.87) when the math domains and the cognitive domains were considered. A high correlation existed: between the model tests and the national tests of the years 2001-2003 (r = 0.78), between the model tests and the national tests of the years 2010- 2012 (r = 0.9), between the national tests of the years 2001-2003 and those of the years 2010- 2012 (0.88), and between the session-1 national tests and session-2 national tests ( r = 0.95). However, it was found that the national tests and the model tests assess a narrow part of the curriculum and include stereotyped test items that emphasize the cognitive domains “knowing” and “applying” while relatively neglecting the cognitive domain “reasoning”, signifying a weak alignment. |
|---|