Blasphemy laws contra defamation laws: An anomaly facing rational choice theory
<p dir="ltr">The standard rational choice theory is based on utilitarian grounds and, consequently, treats all preferences (utilities) as commensurable. Hence, it should treat substantive pain, that is, the loss of reputation/income resulting from defamation, as equivalent to dignity...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Elias L. Khalil (20518877) (author) |
|---|---|
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Dignity entitlements contra property rights: are all preferences reducible to a single metric?
by: Elias L. Khalil (20518877)
Published: (2023) -
Why are Some Transactions Repugnant? Superseding the Utilitarian and the Deontological Explanations
by: Elias L. Khalil (20518877)
Published: (2024) -
القواعد الأصولية المتعلقة بالحرام دراسة أصولية تطبيقية معاصرة
by: Jaber, Saleh Mahmoud Saleh
Published: (2024) -
Who Is Afraid of Love? Adam Smith and the Rational Analysis of Bonding
by: Elias L. Khalil (20518877)
Published: (2025) -
Questioning the ‘subjective well-being’ concept: Distinguishing wellbeing and happiness
by: Elias L. Khalil (20518877)
Published: (2025)