Comparison of X-ray enhancement results between the proposed method and 10 other traditional X-ray enhancement techniques.

<p>The images are arranged from left to right, with Image 1 to Image 10 representing the results of the respective traditional enhancement techniques. (a) Input, (b) CECI [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0316585#pone.0316585.ref039" target=&qu...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Qifeng Liu (10746428) (author)
Other Authors:	Yong Han (111920) (author), Lu Shen (161789) (author), Jialei Du (1446409) (author), Marzia Hoque Tania (11846738) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Medicine Cell Biology Biotechnology Space Science Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified Physical Sciences not elsewhere classified proposed method achieved preserving important tissues essential tissue components 10 contemporary x high noise levels ray images typically simultaneously enhancing contrast optimize image sharpness ray images simultaneously improving shoulder x image contrast certain images removing non outperforming five often overlook mura dataset low contrast improving contrast detail distinguishability comparative studies amplifying blurring ablation experiments
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Comparison of X-ray enhancement results between the proposed method and 10 other traditional X-ray enhancement techniques.

Similar Items