Comparison of inactivation using individual treatments and the combination H2O2/PEF treatment.

All data represents the average of triplicate analysis, error bars represent standard deviation. Statistical significance from Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; (ns) P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001a E...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Zachary Rosenzweig (15874435) (author)
Other Authors:	Jerrick Garcia (15874444) (author), Gary L. Thompson (14132046) (author), Lark J. Perez (1276848) (author)
Published:	2024
Subjects:	Microbiology Molecular Biology Neuroscience Biotechnology Evolutionary Biology Developmental Biology Cancer Infectious Diseases Virology pulsed electric fields lowest acceptable level indicating greater susceptibility gomori buffer using delivered via square 600 ns pulses 5 log cfu 5 &# 8211 5 log reduction several tested conditions div >< p salmonella enterica </ listeria innocua </ escherichia coli </ 5 %) innocua </ enterica </ coli </ ml reduction l </ e </ three sub study aimed oxidative damage nonthermal technology microbial population mic concentrations hydrogen peroxide growing interest food safety 45 min 21 kv 1000 pulse 10 hz
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Comparison of inactivation using individual treatments and the combination H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/PEF treatment.

Similar Items