CDR 0 vs. CDR 0.5.

<div><p>Background</p><p>The Eight-Item Informant Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia (AD8) was developed as a screening tool for dementia, with a cutoff score of 2 suggested by the initial study. However, various studies have reported different cutoff values, and m...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي:	Cho-Hsiang Yang (21246346) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون:	Yi-Ting Lin (173110) (author), Ming H. Hsieh (9676172) (author), Tzung-Jeng Hwang (173142) (author)
منشور في:	2025
الموضوعات:	Biochemistry Medicine Cell Biology Neuroscience Biotechnology Evolutionary Biology Developmental Biology Cancer Science Policy Mental Health Infectious Diseases university teaching hospital minimize recall bias mild neurocognitive disorder major neurocognitive disorder consensus clinical diagnosis recruited 118 participant clinical dementia rating ad8 &# 8217 xlink "> thirty item informant interview cdr &# 8805 best cutoff value optimal cutoff score 2 may result dementia </ p ad8 cutoff value xlink "> cutoff value cutoff score ad8 may participant based may affect without dementia youden index various studies study aimed screening tool review factors normal cognition literature review initial study informant dyads findings suggest evaluation study differentiate aging different purposes balanced sensitivity 2 suggested
الوسوم:	إضافة وسم لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!

CDR 0 vs. CDR 0.5.

مواد مشابهة