Comparison of axial length (A) and spherical equivalent (B) in epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH).

<p>The mean axial length was longer in MPH, ERM-FS, and LMH compared to ERM. The spherical equivalent was significantly smaller in the MPH, ERM-FS, and LMH compared to the ERM. Significantly different in Tukey-Kramer test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.</p>

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Noriko Kubota (11915648) (author)
Other Authors:	Kazunori Miyata (514772) (author), Yosai Mori (3897565) (author), Yuji Nakano (1830784) (author), Hitoshi Goto (3005127) (author), Fumiki Okamoto (776380) (author)
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Biochemistry Medicine Cell Biology Molecular Biology Neuroscience Developmental Biology Science Policy Mental Health Infectious Diseases outer retinal cysts optical coherence tomography least 6 months corrected visual acuity central fovea thickness although preoperative bcva three associated diseases enrolling 720 eyes lamellar macular hole bcva ), presence significantly different among 63 eyes ), 42 eyes ). bcva significantly improved xlink "> erm mph ), erm lmh versus erm fs versus erm xlink "> erm versus postoperative bcva lmh versus fs ), 001 ). macular volume macular pseudohole three groups significantly larger significantly higher underwent vitrectomy retrospectively reviewed postoperative best lmh based higher frequency frequently observed epiretinal proliferation epiretinal membrane ep ), ellipsoid zone crt ), clinical characteristics 664 patients
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Comparison of axial length (A) and spherical equivalent (B) in epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH).

Similar Items