Visual comparison of the resulting tractograms. From top to bottom line: iFOD2, PTT, iFOD2 with prior, PTT with prior, iFOD2 with BST priors and PTT with BST priors.

<p>Last line: Prior weighting map, where brighter pixel denotes a higher usage of the prior. From left to right: The Arcuate fascicle (AF), the Cingulum (CG), the Corticospinal tract (CST), the Optic radiation (OR) and the Superior longitudinal fascicle I (SLF I). Note that the quantitative re...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي:	Thomas Durantel (20933812) (author)
مؤلفون آخرون:	Gabriel Girard (4542808) (author), Emmanuel Caruyer (813876) (author), Olivier Commowick (545356) (author), Julie Coloigner (4494766) (author)
منشور في:	2025
الموضوعات:	Cell Biology Immunology Developmental Biology Space Science Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified Mathematical Sciences not elsewhere classified tract orientation distribution therefore could help still highly debated segmented fiber bundles overall spatial coverage orientation distribution function human connectome project fiber reconstruction may existing true bundles false positive fibers anatomical prior applicable high quality data crossing fiber regions classical algorithms achieve bundle specific tractography prior incorporation method proposed method captures crossing fibers prior knowledge prior extracted challenging regions novel method method improves two odf two datasets trekker ptt tracking process riemannian framework recent studies powerful approach clinical data clinical context bottleneck problems based state art algorithms also compared
الوسوم:	إضافة وسم لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!

Visual comparison of the resulting tractograms. From top to bottom line: iFOD2, PTT, iFOD2 with prior, PTT with prior, iFOD2 with BST priors and PTT with BST priors.

مواد مشابهة