Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels does not improve performance of difficult visual discriminations.
<p><b>A)</b> Example of grating stimuli separated by 15° for difficult task (top), schematic of optogenetic manipulations activating only PV cells expressing ChR2 (middle), optogenetic stimulation timings for all four conditions aligned to stimulus onset (STIM ON) or offset (STIM O...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | Lilia Kukovska (22683586) (author) |
|---|---|
| مؤلفون آخرون: | Katharina A. Wilmes (22683589) (author), Natsumi Y. Homma (22683592) (author), Claudia Clopath (324706) (author), Jasper Poort (22683595) (author) |
| منشور في: |
2025
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Stimulating PV cells at nonsilencing levels during entire stimulus presentation or late phase V1 activity impairs discrimination performance, whereas stimulating during early phase V1 activity improves performance.
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025) -
PV cell activation alone does not induce changes in behavioral redouts during the stimulation period (0–2 s).
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025) -
Changes in neural selectivity caused by PV cell activation reflect behavioral performance in easy but not difficult discriminations.
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025) -
(related to Fig 3) Behavioral parameters in the difficult discrimination task.
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025) -
(related to Fig 3) Testing a difficult discrimination task.
حسب: Lilia Kukovska (22683586)
منشور في: (2025)